Bottom | homepage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by
Judy Wood
This page last updated, May 19, 2008
click on images for enlargements.
|
This page is currently UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
(originally posted: March 25, 2008)
MOVE TO APPENDIX2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source: (doc)(pdf) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 3: Preliminary forecast evaluation (heterogeneous sample) for Hurricane Erin, 1-15 September 2001. Forecast errors for tropical storm and hurricane stages (n mi) are followed by the number of forecasts in parentheses. Errors smaller than the NHC official forecast are shown in bold-face type. Source: |
(Original figure from source.) | |
Figure 1: Best track for Hurricane Erin, September 2001. Track during the extratropical stage is based on analyses from the NOAA Marine Prediction Center. Source: |
Figure 1x: Best track for Hurricane Katrina, August 2005. Track during the extratropical stage is based on analyses from the NOAA Marine Prediction Center. Source: Katrina_p37_75.jpg, Katrina_p37_150.jpg, Katrina_p37_300.jpg http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL122005_Katrina.pdf |
click on images for enlargements.
|
(Original figure from source.) | |
Figure 2: Best track maximum sustained surface wind speed curve for Hurricane Erin, September 2001, and the observations on which the best track curve is based. Aircraft observations have been adjusted for elevation using 90%, 80%, and 80% reduction factors for observations from 700 mb, 850 mb, and 1500 ft, respectively. Dropwindsonde observations include actual 10 m winds (sfc), as well as surface estimates derived from the mean wind over the lowest 150 m of the wind sounding (LLM), and from the sounding boundary layer mean (MBL). Estimates during the extratropical stage are based on analyses from the NOAA Marine Prediction Center. Source: |
Figure 2x: Best track maximum sustained surface wind speed curve for Hurricane Katrina, August 2005, and the observations on which the best track curve is based. Source: TCR-AL122005_Katrina38_75.jpg, TCR-AL122005_Katrina38_150.jpg, TCR-AL122005_Katrina38_300.jpg http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL122005_Katrina.pdf |
(Original figure from source.) | |
Figure 3: Best track minimum central pressure curve for Hurricane Erin, September 2001, and the observations on which the best track curve are based. Estimates during the extratropical stage are based on analyses from the NOAA Marine Prediction Center. Source: |
Figure 3: Best track minimum central pressure curve for Hurricane Katrina, August 2005, and the observations on which the best track curve are based. Estimates during the extratropical stage are based on analyses from the NOAA Marine Prediction Center. Source: TCR-AL122005_Katrina39_75.jpg, TCR-AL122005_Katrina39_150.jpg, TCR-AL122005_Katrina39_300.jpg |
|
Casimir Force Top
Physicists have 'solved' mystery of levitation By Roger Highfield, Science Editor Last Updated: 1:41am BST 08/08/2007 Levitation has been elevated from being pure science fiction to science fact, according to a study reported today by physicists.
Now, in another report that sounds like it comes out of the pages of a Harry Potter book, the University of St Andrews team has created an 'incredible levitation effects' by engineering the force of nature which normally causes objects to stick together. Professor Ulf Leonhardt and Dr Thomas Philbin, from the University of St Andrews in Scotland, have worked out a way of reversing this pheneomenon, known as the Casimir force, so that it repels instead of attracts. Their discovery could ultimately lead to frictionless micro-machines with moving parts that levitate But they say that, in principle at least, the same effect could be used to levitate bigger objects too, even a person. The Casimir force is a consequence of quantum mechanics, the theory that describes the world of atoms and subatomic particles that is not only the most successful theory of physics but also the most baffling. The force is due to neither electrical charge or gravity, for example, but the fluctuations in all-pervasive energy fields in the intervening empty space between the objects and is one reason atoms stick together, also explaining a "dry glue" effect that enables a gecko to walk across a ceiling. Now, using a special lens of a kind that has already been built, Prof Ulf Leonhardt and Dr Thomas Philbin report in the New Journal of Physics they can engineer the Casimir force to repel, rather than attact. Because the Casimir force causes problems for nanotechnologists, who are trying to build electrical circuits and tiny mechanical devices on silicon chips, among other things, the team believes the feat could initially be used to stop tiny objects from sticking to each other. Prof Leonhardt explained,
The practicalities of designing the lens to do this are daunting but not impossible and levitation "could happen over quite a distance". Prof Leonhardt leads one of four teams - three of them in Britain - to have put forward a theory in a peer-reviewed journal to achieve invisibility by making light waves flow around an object - just as a river flows undisturbed around a smooth rock. |
|||||
Figure 25. Physicists have 'solved' mystery of levitation By Roger Highfield, Science Editor, 08/08/2007 (8/08/07) Source: |
Top | homepage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|