Bottom homepage
Dirt
WTC & Hutch (JJ)
Erin & Field (erin)
Billiard Balls
Qui Tam Case
Why Indeed
Index Erin1 Erin2
Erin3
Erin4 Erin5 Erin6 Erin7 Erin8 Erin9 Erin10
Appendix_1 Appendix_2 Appendix_3


9/11 Weather Anomalies and Field Effects
(page 6)

by

Judy Wood

This page last updated, May 19, 2008

click on images for enlargements.

This page is currently UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

(originally posted: March 25, 2008)
Hurricane Erin, September 11, 2001
Figure 1. Hurricane Erin on 9/11/01
(9/11/01) Source:, (9/11/01) Original Image: (more)

The Plume Top


Dust/fuming Cloud 2001 Top
September 11, 2001
Figure 2.
(9/11/01) Source:

September 11, 2001
September 11, 2001
Figure 3.
(9/11/01) Source:
Figure 4.
(9/11/01) Source:

September 11, 2001
September 11, 2001
Figure 5.
(9/11/01) Source: (original)
Figure 6.
(9/11/01) Source: (original)

September 11, 2001
September 11, 2001
Figure 7.
(9/11/01) Source: (original)
Figure 8.
(9/11/01) Source: (original)

September 11, 2001
Figure 9.
(9/11/01) Source: (original)
Figure 10.
(10/31/01) Source


September 12, 2001 (perhaps 9/11/01?)
September 12, 2001 (perhaps 9/11/01?)
Figure 11. This is a satellite image captured on 9/12/01. It appears that the cloud emerging from the WTC site stays together until it reaches a particular altitude where it begins to just disperse. There appears to be a kink in the cloud trail where this occurs.
(9/12/01
) Source: space imaging:
Figure 12. Lower-left portion of previous image. This image was posted with the date of 9/12/01. However, the dark plume just west (or above?) the WTC complex and the denseness of the white fuming implies this photo was more likely captured on 9/11/01.
(9/12/01) Source: space imaging:


September 12, 2001
September 12, 2001
Figure 13.
(9/12/01) Source:
Figure 14.
(9/12/01) Source:

Figure 15.
(11?/?/01) Source
:
Figure 16. Cotton Candy - mold.
(10/31/01) Source:


click on images for enlargements.


Plume thinning Top
September 12?, 2001
Figure 17.
(9/12?/01) Source: (higher resolution)
Figure 18. Lower-left portion of previous image. The fuming is becoming translucent.


September 12?, 2001 (9/12/01 or 9/13/01?)
Figure 19. Boiling a pot of water on the stove doesn't fill a kitchen with steam. If the flight 93 story were true, a view similar to the image above would be anticipated for the passengers on the left side of the plane. This flight was reported to have taken off from the Newark Airport at 8:42 AM and the WTC1 event was reported to have occurred at 8:46:26 AM. In essence, the passengers on "flight 93" would have had a front-seat view of the event.
(9/12?/01) Source
:

For a simple calculation, assume this plane has traveled about 20 miles since its wheels left the ground, and assume it's averate speed since taking off is 200 mph.
(20 miles)/(200 miles/hr.)*(60 min./hr.) = 6 min.
20*60/200 = 6 minutes.
20 miles at 200 mph = 6 minutes
20 miles at 240 mph = 5 minutes
16 miles at 240 mph = 4 minutes.


click on images for enlargements.


Further plume thinning Top
September 13, 2001 (?)
September 13, 2001 (?)
Figure 20. What is in this cloud of fumes rising from the WTC site?

(9/13?/01) Source:
Figure 21. Photo taken from the International Space Station. (reference)
(9/13/01) Source: wikipedia (however, it appears Wikepedia incorrectly stated it as 9/11/01)
,
(9/13/01) Source:

September 13, 2001
Figure 22. Photo taken from the International Space Station. (reference). The fuming appears translucent blue.
(9/13/01) Source: wikipedia (however, it appears Wikepedia incorrectly stated it as 9/11/01)
,
(9/13/01) Source:

It rained on 9/14/01, beginning in the early morning and throughout the day.
It again rained on 9/20/01.


September 15, 2001
December 31, 2001
Figure 24. The clouds look different than the fuming.
(9/15/01) Source:
Figure 25.
(12/31/01) Source:

June 8, 2002
September 4, 2002
September 22, 2002
Figure 26.
(6/8/02) Source:
Figure 27.
(9/4/02) Source:
Figure 28.
(1/22/02) Source:


click on images for enlargements.

   Figure 29. Record Breaking California Wildfires
On October 23rd 2007, the Terra-MODIS instrument captured this image of multiple wildfires and smoke driven by powerful Santa Ana winds in southern California. The fires flared up over the previous weekend, when temperatures surged past 110 degrees in some parts of the state, creating tinder-like conditions in areas already starved of water by an unusually dry winter. The wildfires have forced nearly 1/2 a million people to evacuate their homes from San Diego to just north of Los Angeles. Image by Ridgway & Hubanks, NASA GSFC. More RGB images of MODIS granules can be found in the L1B Granules section.

Plume history and comparison Top
September 11? 2001
September 12, 2001 (perhaps 9/11/01?)
September 12, 2001 (perhaps 9/11/01?)
September 13, 2001 (?)
September 15, 2001
Figure 30.
(9/11?/01) Source: NewsdayPlume1.jpg
Figure 31. This satellite image was captured on 9/11/01 or 9/12/01. .
(9/12/01
) Source: space imaging:
Figure 32. Lower-left portion of previous image.
(9/12/01) Source: space imaging: browse.jpg
Figure 33. View from the International Space Station. (Date is uncertain, but likely 9/13/01.)
(9/12-13/01) Source:
wikipedia ,
Figure 34.
(9/15/01) Source: manhattan_9_15_01.jpg

August ??, 2007
2003
Figure 35. California wild fires
(8/07) Source:
Figure 36. Influence of the Kuwait oil fires plume (1991) on the microphysical development of clouds, Yinon Rudich
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 108, NO. D15, 4478, doi:10.1029/2003JD003472, 2003
Link to Journal of Geophysical Research
(542x542)
(?/?/?) Source:

The Kuwaiti fires sent smoke out and up. The WTC sent opaque dust out and up and in the same way. For the WTC, the white-looking dust cloud stays together as it moves in a southern direction. It appears that when it gets above a particular altitude, it just disperses and no longer stays together. The same is true for the Kuwaiti fires. In the WTC photo, the cloud trail appears to have a kink in it where it changes behavior. The same appears to be true for the Kuwait photo, but it's hard to tell. Why are auto emissions and issue? What is air pollution?

excerpt: "The smoke plume contained mostly soot aerosols with radius ranging between 0.015 and 35 mm and concentrations of up to 10 5 cm À3 [Hudson and Clarke, 1992; Parungo et al., 1992]. Typically, the ultrafine particles (0.003 mm < r <0.015 mm) concentration was 30% higher than that of the fine mode (0.015 mm < r < 0.3 mm) [Hudson and Clarke, 1992]. With increasing height and distance from the source, the concentration of the small and medium particles (0.06 < r < 0.6 mm) increased, while the coarse particles concentration (r > 0.5 mm) decreased, mainly because of sedimentation."
(Reference provided by "who" and is greatly appreciated.) (1991) Source


Figure 37.
(10/31/01) Source


click on images for enlargements.


Dust-particle data Top
Figure 38. At Ground Zero in New York City, UC Davis Professor Emeritus Thomas Cahill describes his air-quality findings to reporters on Feb. 23, 2002, just before testifying at an EPA investigative hearing in Manhattan. (Sylvia Wright/UC Davis News Service file photo)
(2/23/02) Source: (study)(archived)
Figure 40a and 40b. For the WTC samples, particle sizes below the (.09 to .24 micron) size range were not analyzes. But, as can be seen by the trend, the smaller the particle size, the more there was of it. Typically, the smaller the particle size, the less there is of it.
Source: (original)
Figure 39.
Source:


Excerpts from Dr. Thomas Cahill's website, where the data is presented.

"The new work helps explain the very fine particles and extraordinarily high concentrations found by an earlier UC Davis study, the first to identify very fine metallic aerosols in unprecedented amounts from Ground Zero. It will be essential to understanding the growing record of health problems."

.......

"The new study also confirms, Cahill said, that the very fine particles observed were almost totally from the trade center debris pile and not from other upwind sources, such as power plants and the diesel trucks used to haul away the debris.

When the trade center towers burned and collapsed, tons of concrete, glass, furniture, carpets, insulation, computers and paper were reduced to enormous, oxygen-poor debris piles that slowly burned until Dec. 19, 2001.

In that hot pile, some of the debris' constituent elements combined with organic matter and abundant chlorine from papers and plastics, and then escaped to the surface as metal-rich gases. These then either burned or chemically decomposed into very fine particles capable of penetrating deeply into human lungs.

In the trade-center air samples, Cahill identified four classes of particles that have been named by the EPA as likely to harm human health:

* Fine and very fine transition metals, which interfere with lung chemistry.
* Acids, in this case sulfuric acid, which attack cilia and lung cells directly.
* Very fine, un-dissolvable (insoluble) particles, in this case glass, which travel through the lungs to the bloodstream and heart.
* High-temperature organic matter, many components of which are known to be carcinogens.

"For each of these four classes of pollutant, we recorded the highest levels we have ever seen in over 7,000 measurements we have made of very fine air pollution throughout the world, including Kuwait and China," Cahill said.

After the debris fire was out, pollution levels dropped, Cahill said. DELTA Group measurements at the trade-center site made in May 2002, with the American Lung Association of New York, showed that levels of almost all of the very fine components had declined more than 90 percent,"

Reference 1. "Trade Center Debris Pile Was a Chemical Factory, Says New Study," September 10, 2003
(9/10/03)
Source: (archived)[Emphasis added.]














Reference Sites Top

Reference Sites
Erin 2001 wind analyses
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Storm_pages/erin2001/wind.html, (archived)

Background on the HRD Surface Wind Analysis System
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Storm_pages/surf_background.html, (archived)

Hurricane Erin 2001
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Storm_pages/erin2001/, (archived)

NASA Makes A Heated 3-D Look Into Hurricane Erin's Eye
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/10/051007090048.htm, (archived)

Images and Data from Terra
http://terra.nasa.gov/Gallery/

Images
http://modis-atmos.gsfc.nasa.gov/IMAGES/index.html



, (archived)














 Continue to next page.
 


 Continue to next page.



Top homepage
Dirt
WTC & Hutch (JJ)
Erin & Field (erin)
Billiard Balls
Qui Tam Case
Why Indeed
Index Erin1 Erin2
Erin3
Erin4 Erin5 Erin6 Erin7 Erin8 Erin9 Erin10
Appendix_1 Appendix_2 Appendix_3


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this webpage are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This webpage has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

© 2006-2008 Judy Wood and the author above. All rights reserved.