Dirt
WTC & Hutch (JJ)
Erin & Field (erin)
Billiard Balls
Qui Tam Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

DR. JUDY WOOD on behalf of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff/Relator,
vs.
Defendants.
This is no collapse!
Does this look like a collapse?
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. (ARA),
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP.(SAIC),
UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC.,
WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC. (WJE),
ROLF JENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.(RJA),
COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.,
SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER, INC. (SGH),
SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL, LLP (SOM),
GILSANZ MURRAY STEFICEK LLP (GMS),
HUGHES ASSOCIATES, INC. (HA),
ROSENWASSER/GROSSMAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C.,
S. K. GHOSH ASSOCIATES, INC. (GA),
TENG & ASSOCIATES, INC. (TA),
AJMAL ABBASI,
EDUARDO KAUSEL,
DAVID PARKS,
DAVID SHARP,
JOSEF VAN DYCK,
KASPAR WILLIAM,
DANIELE VENEZANO,
DATASOURCE, INC.,
GEOSTAATS, INC.,
NuSTATS,
EVIDENCE FOR DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS PUT FORWARD IN A DQA REQUEST FOR CORRECTION: PERSONS WITH SUPPORTING INFORMATION ARE ASKED TO COME FORWARD AND BE HEARD
Top
Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Dr. Wood's Case:
Qui-Tam, Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
July 23, 2008, Jerry V. Leaphart, Danbury, CT



Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Dr. Judy Wood on behalf of the United States of America,
Plaintiff/Relator,
vs.
Applied Research Associates, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
Wood-Notice of Appeal
( Filed July 23, 2008 in response to decsion1 and decision2.)
Page 1 of 1




Comments?
I would like to know your thoughts on the above decision. You may leave a brief anonymous message, a contact source and/or a time/method to contact you. 500 character limit. You may also specify a particular recipient.
Send to:
Contact E-mail Optional:
Message:

 Characters Left:



Qui-Tam, updates
Dr. Wood's Case:
Dr. Reynolds' Case

Qui-Tam, Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
July 23, 2008, Jerry V. Leaphart, Danbury, CT

Qui-Tam, Deny Motion to Reconsider Decision
July 11, 2008, George B. Daniels, United States District Judge, New York, NY

Qui-Tam, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3
July 11, 2008, Jerry V. Leaphart, Danbury, CT

Qui-Tam, MemorandumDecision of Wood
June 26, 2008, George B. Daniels, United States District Judge, New York, NY


Qui-Tam, Deny Motion to Reconsider Decision
July 11, 2008, George B. Daniels, United States District Judge, New York, NY

Qui-Tam, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3
July 11, 2008, Jerry V. Leaphart, Danbury, CT

Qui-Tam, Memorandum Decision of Reynolds
June 26, 2008, George B. Daniels, United States District Judge, New York, NY



















Shortcuts:

Jump to: Notice of Appeal




Dirt
WTC & Hutch (JJ)
Erin & Field (erin)
Billiard Balls
Qui Tam Case



In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this webpage are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This webpage has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

© 2006-2008 Judy Wood and the author above. All rights reserved.