Bottom homepage
WTC & Hutch (JJ)
Erin & Field (erin)
Billiard Balls
Qui Tam Case
Why Indeed
Index JJ1 JJ2
JJ 3
JJ4 JJ 5 JJ6 JJ7 JJ8
Appendix_1 Appendix_2 Appendix_3

Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect
(Appendix 3)


Dr. Judy Wood and John Hutchison

This page last updated, February 5, 2008

This page is currently UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

(originally posted: December 25, 2007)


(1) GEORGE LISZICASZ -- Energy Exploration Technologies, Inc. Top

CEO and inventor of the SFD technology

Mr. Liszicasz is the inventor of the SFD technology and has been our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since inception. Mr. Liszicasz was appointed our interim President and interim Chief Financial Officer in July 2002.  Mr. Liszicasz's primary responsibilities, as the Chief Executive Officer, interim President and interim Chief Financial Officer, are to ensure the smooth running of the day-to-day operations and to further develop our SFD technology. 

Prior to founding NXT, Mr. Liszicasz was Vice President of Susa Petroleum Inc. from 1993 to 1994.  From 1987 to 1995, Mr. Liszicasz was President of Owl Industries Ltd., a developer of electronic controlling devices, where he had both engineering and business responsibilities.  Mr. Liszicasz serves as a board member of each of our four subsidiaries; NXT Energy Canada, Inc., NXT Energy USA, Inc., NXT Aero Canada, Inc. and NXT Aero USA, Inc.
Figure xx. GEORGE LISZICASZ -- Energy Exploration Technologies, Inc.

(2) Robert L. Forward Top

Robert L. Forward

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Robert Lull Forward, commonly known as Robert L. Forward, (August 15, 1932 - September 21, 2002) was an American physicist and science fiction writer. His fiction is noted for its scientific credibility, and uses many ideas developed during his work as an aerospace engineer.


Life and career

He earned his doctorate from the University of Maryland in 1965, for the development of a bar antenna for the detection of gravitational radiation. He then went to work at the research labs of Hughes Aircraft, where he continued his research on gravity measurement and received 18 patents. He took early retirement in 1987, to focus on his fiction writing and consulting for such clients as NASA and the U.S. Air Force. In 1994, he co-founded the company Tethers Unlimited, Inc., where he served as Chief Scientist and Chairman until 2002.

Much of his research focused on the leading edges of speculative physics but was always grounded in what he believed humans could accomplish. He worked on such projects as space tethers and space fountains, solar sails (including Starwisp), antimatter propulsion, and other spacecraft propulsion technologies, and did further research on more esoteric possibilities such as time travel and negative matter.

In addition to more than 200 papers and articles, he published 11 novels. His treatment of hard-science topics in fictional form is highly reminiscent of the work of Hal Clement. He described his first novel, Dragon's Egg, as "a textbook on neutron star physics disguised as a novel." His novel Rocheworld describes a double-planet system with a single shared atmosphere and ocean. Dr. Forward co-authored two Rocheworld novels with his wife, Martha Dodson Forward, and two additional Rocheworld novels with his second daughter Julie Fuller.

Dr. Forward's son, Bob Forward, has led a successful career as a storyboard artist and writer in television animation, including in He-Man and the Masters of the Universe, Legend of Zelda, the Animated Series, and most famously, Beast Wars. He is also the author of two novels, The Owl and The Owl 2: Scarlet Serenade.

Dr. Forward's oldest daughter, Mary Lois Mattlin, is a teacher and homemaker.

Dr. Forward's youngest, Eve Forward, has written two novels: Villains by Necessity and Animist.

Forward Mass Detector

Dr Forward's extensive work in the field of gravitational radiation detection included the invention of the rotating cruciform gravity gradiometer or 'Forward Mass Detector', for Lunar Mascon (mass concentration) measurements. Misner, Wheeler & Thorne ( Gravitation ISBN 0-7167-0344-0 ) point out that it can detect the curvature of spacetime produced by a fist. The principle behind it is quite simple - getting the implementation right is tricky. Essentially, two beams are crossed over and connected with an axle through their crossing point. They are held at right angles to each other by springs. They have heavy masses at the ends of the beams, and the whole assembly spun around the common axle at high speed. The angle between the beams is measured continuously, and if it varies with a period half that of the rotation period, it means that the detector is experiencing a measurable gravitational field gradient.



Dragon's Egg Series

Rocheworld Series

  • Rocheworld (Baen, 1990) (155,000 words)
    • Rocheworld (Original Manuscript, 1981) (150,000 words)
    • Rocheworld (Analog Science Fiction/Science Fact, 1982) (60,000 words)
    • The Flight of the Dragonfly (Hardcover, Timescape, 1984) (approx 100,000 words)
    • The Flight of the Dragonfly (Paperback, Baen, 1985) (110,000 words)
  • Return to Rocheworld (February 1993) (with Julie Forward Fuller)
  • Marooned on Eden (August 1993) (with Margaret Dodson Forward)
  • Ocean Under the Ice (1994) (with Margaret Dodson Forward)
  • Rescued from Paradise (1995) (with Julie Forward Fuller)



Future Magic discusses possible future applications of Skyhooks and gravitational rings amongst other technologies, including a plan by Hughes aircraft for a potential flying saucer.

Dr. Forward also wrote many articles in scientific journals and filed many patents, mainly while working for Hughes Aircraft.

External links


NAME Forward, Robert Lull
SHORT DESCRIPTION physicist and science fiction writer.
DATE OF BIRTH 15 August 1932
DATE OF DEATH 21 September 2002

(3) Frank Close Top

Frank Close

Frank Close OBE is currently Professor of Physics at the University of Oxford. He is a Fellow of Exeter College, Oxford. He is well respected for increasing public understanding of science, as well as for his academic work.

His Royal Institution Christmas Lectures in 1993, entitled The Cosmic Onion, gave their name to one of his books. From 2000 to 2003 he gave public lectures as professor of astronomy at Gresham College, London.   

He took his undergraduate degree at St Andrews University, before reading for a DPhil in theoretical physics at Magdalen College, Oxford. From Oxford he went to Stanford University for two years as a postdoctoral fellow and then to CERN. He joined the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in 1975 as a research physicist and was latterly Head of Theoretical Physics Division. He headed the communication and public education activities at CERN from 1997 to 2000.


  • Close, F. E. (1979). An Introduction to Quarks and Partons. London: Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-175150-3. 
  • Close, Frank (1983). The Cosmic Onion: Quarks and the Nature of the Universe. London: Heinemann Educational. ISBN 0-435-69170-8. 
    • rev. ed. (2006) The New Cosmic Onion: Quarks and the Nature of the Universe. London: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 1-58488-798-2. 
  • Close, Frank; Michael Marten, and Christine Sutton (1987). The Particle Explosion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-851965-6. 
    • rev. ed. (2002) The Particle Odyssey: A Journey to the Heart of the Matter. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-850486-1. 
  • Close, Frank (1988). End: Cosmic Catastrophe and the Fate of the Universe. London: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-671-65461-6.  (Published in the U.S. as Apocalypse When?)
  • Close, Frank (1990). Too Hot to Handle: The Story of the Race for Cold Fusion. London: W. H. Allen. ISBN 1-85227-206-6. 
  • Close, Frank (2000). Lucifer's Legacy: The Meaning of Asymmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-850380-6. 
  • Close, Frank (2004). Particle Physics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-280434-0. 
  • Close, Frank (2007). The Void: This is an exploration of nothing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-922590-7. 

External links

See also

Figure xx. Retrieved from ""

(4) Scientific Experts' Comments on Meier's Evidence Top

Scientific Experts' Comments on Meier's Evidence
from Author Gary Kinder's "Open Letter to the UFO Community"

Figure xx. T
Source: (archived)


R. MEAD HONORED FOR BEAMED ENERGY WORK: The Propulsion Directorate's. Dr. Franklin B. Mead, Jr. was recently honored with the 2005 International Symposium
Figure xx. T
Source: (archived)

(6) Breakthrough Propulsion Physics  10.12.2006 Top

Breakthrough Propulsion Physics 10.12.2006 NASA Logo, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Artist's depiction of a hypothetical Wormhole Induction Propelled Spacecraft, based loosely on the 1994 "warp drive" paper of Miguel Alcubierre. Credit: NASA CD-98-76634 by Les Bossinas.


The term breakthrough propulsion refers to concepts like space drives and faster-than-light travel, the kind of breakthroughs that would make interstellar travel practical.

For a general explanation of the challenges and approaches of interstellar flight, please visit the companion website: Warp Drive: When? The Warp-When site is written for the general public and uses icons of science fiction to help convey such notions. This website, on the other hand, is intended for scientists and engineers.

This research falls within the realm of physics instead of technology, with the distinction being that physics is about uncovering the laws of nature while technology is about applying that physics to build useful devices. Since existing technology is inadequate for traversing astronomical distances between neighboring stars (even if advanced to the limit of its underlying physics), the only way to circumvent these limits is to discover new propulsion physics. The discovery of new force-production and energy-exchange principles  would lead to a whole new class of technologies. This is the motivation of breakthrough propulsion physics research.

Objectively, the desired breakthroughs might turn out to be impossible, but progress is not made by conceding defeat. Reciprocally, breakthroughs have a habit of taking pessimists by surprise, but can equally remain elusive. By proceeding in small, incremental steps that focus on the immediate questions and by emphasizing the reliability of the findings rather than their long-range implications, relevant and dependable knowledge will result. Regardless of whether the breakthroughs are found, this inquiry provides an additional perspective with which to seek answers to the lingering unknowns of our universe.

Status of the NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics (BPP) Project

NASA sponsored Glenn's BPP Project over 1996-2002, which addressed 8 different research approaches, produced 16 peer-reviewed journal articles and an award-winning website (Warp-When), all for a total investment of less than $1.6M. During this time, the BPP Project also coordinated with related research funded at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. With the implementation of the 2003 Federal Budget (p.325), all advanced propulsion research was deferred, including these research efforts.

Now, with NASA's emphasis on fulfilling the President's Vision for Space Exploration, only in-house work continues with no funding planned for supporting external research solicitations. The Project's leader, Marc G. Millis, continues to monitor and assess a variety of ongoing research with the assistance of an informal network of volunteers scattered across academia, industry, various NASA Centers and other Federal labs.

At present, unless there is a formal invitation for proposals, NASA cannot provide review services to other researchers, but does welcome receiving copies of relevant reports that have been published in the open, peer-reviewed literature (conference papers and websites are not suitable submissions).

Status of Research

No breakthroughs appear imminent. This is a nascent field where a variety of concepts and issues are being explored in the scientific literature, beginning since about the early 1990s. The collective status is still at step 1 and 2 of the scientific method, "defining the problem" and "collecting data," but a small number of approaches are already at step 4, "testing hypotheses;" with experiments underway.

Cautionary note: On a topic this visionary and whose implications are profound, there is a risk of encountering, premature conclusions in the literature, driven by overzealous enthusiasts as well as pedantic pessimists. The most productive path is to seek out and build upon publications that focus on the critical make-break issues and lingering unknowns, both from the innovators' perspective and their skeptical challengers. Avoid works with broad-sweeping and unsubstantiated claims, either supportive or dismissive.

The references below can serve as starting points for deeper inquires. Citations within these reports will take you to other relevant works. The recent survey is also provided a separate web page for your convenience.

Recent Survey

Millis, M. G. (2005) "Assessing Potential Propulsion Breakthroughs." New Trends in Astrodynamics and Applications, Edward Belbruno, (ed.). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1065: 441-461.
[Note: Although this is published through a non-NASA venue, the contents of this government-sponsored work are available without copyright restrictions in the US.]
+Web Page   +Download PDF (0.1 MB).

Sample Research

Quantum Vacuum Energy
Maclay, G. Jordan, Jay Hammer, Rod Clark, Michael George, Yeong Kim, and Asit Kir. (2004) Study of Vacuum Energy Physics for Breakthrough Propulsion. NASA/CR–2006-213311
+Abstract  +Download PDF (4.4 MB)
Transient Inertia
Cramer, John G., Curran W. Fey, and Damon V. Casissi. (2004) Tests of Mach's Principle With a Mechanical Oscillator. NASA/CR–2004-213310.
+Abstract   +Download PDF (1.5 MB)
Lifters, Biefeld-Brown, Asymmetrical Capacitors, etc.
Canning, Francis X. Cory Melcher, and Edwin Winet. (2004) Asymmetrical Capacitors for Propulsion. NASA/CR–2004-213312.
+Abstract   +Download PDF (1.0 MB)
Space Drives(Step 1: defining the problem)
Millis, M. G. (1997) "Challenge to Create the Space Drive." AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, 13: 577-582.
[Note: Although this is published through a non-NASA venue, the contents of this government-sponsored work are available without copyright restrictions in the US.]
+Download PDF (0.7 MB)
Faster Than Light (general relativity approach)
Visser, Matt. (1996)  Lorentzian Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking. Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc.

Project Management Methods

Millis, M. G. (2004) Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Project: Project Management Methods , NASA/TM–2004-213406.
+Abstract   +Download PDF (0.4 MB)

+ BPP Home

Figure xx. Breakthrough Propulsion Physics  10.12.2006

(7) Russian Woodpecker Top

Russian Woodpecker

Duga-3 array outside Chernobyl. The array of pairs of cylindrical/conical cages on the right are the driven elements, fed at the facing points with a form of ladder line suspended from stand-off platforms at top right. A backplane reflector of small wires can just be seen left of center, most clearly at the bottom of the image.
Duga-3 array outside Chernobyl. The array of pairs of cylindrical/conical cages on the right are the

driven elements, fed at the facing points with a form of ladder line suspended from stand-off platforms at top right. A backplane reflector of small wires can just be seen left of center, most clearly at the bottom of the image.

The Russian Woodpecker was a notorious Soviet signal that could be heard on the shortwave radio bands worldwide between July 1976 and December 1989. It sounded like a sharp, repetitive tapping noise, at 10 Hz, giving rise to the "Woodpecker" name. The random frequency hops disrupted legitimate broadcast, amateur radio, and utility transmissions and resulted in thousands of complaints by many countries worldwide.

The signal was long believed to be that of an over-the-horizon radar (OTH) system. This theory was publicly confirmed after the fall of the Soviet Union, and is now known to be the Duga-3 system, part of the Soviet ABM early-warning network. This was something that NATO military intelligence was well aware of all along, having photographed it and giving it the NATO reporting name Steel Yard.



The Soviets had been working on early warning radars for their anti-ballistic missile systems through the 1960s, but most of these had been line-of-sight systems that were useful for raid analysis and interception only. None of these systems had the capability to provide early-warning of a launch, which would give the defenses time to study the attack and plan a response. At the time the Soviet early-warning satellite network was not well developed, so work started on over-the-horizon radar systems for this associated role in the late 1960s.

The first experimental system, Duga-1, was built outside Mykolaiv in the Ukraine, successfully detecting rocket launches from Baikonur Cosmodrome at 2,500 kilometers. This was followed by the prototype Duga-2, built on the same site, which was able to track launches from the far east and submarines in the Pacific Ocean as the missiles flew towards Novaya Zemlya. Both of these radars were aimed east and were fairly low power, but with the concept proven work began on an operational system. These Duga-3 systems used a transmitter and receiver separated by about 60 km.[1]


Starting in 1976 a new and powerful radio signal was detected worldwide, and quickly dubbed the Woodpecker by amateur radio operators. Transmission power on some woodpecker transmitters was estimated to be as high as 10 MW EIRP. As well as disrupting shortwave amateur radio and broadcasting it could sometimes be heard over telephone circuits due to the strength of the signals. This led to a thriving industry of "Woodpecker filters" and noise blankers.

One idea amateur radio operators used to combat this interference was to attempt to "jam" the signal by transmitting synchronized unmodulated continuous wave signals, at the same pulse rate as the offending signal.[2] This idea was considered, but abandoned as impractical. Simple CW pulses didn't appear to have any effect. However, playing back recordings of the woodpecker transmissions sometimes caused the woodpecker transmissions to shift frequency leading to speculation that the receiving stations were able to differentiate between the "signature" waveform of the woodpecker transmissions and a simple pulsed carrier.[3]


Triangulation quickly revealed the signals to come from Ukraine. Confusion due to small differences in the reports being made from various military sources led to the site being alternatively located near Kiev, Minsk, Chernobyl, Gomel or Chernihiv. All of these reports were describing the same deployment, with the transmitter only a few kilometers southwest of Chernobyl (south of Minsk, northwest of Kiev) and the receiver about 50 km northwest of Chernobyl (just west of Chernihiv, south of Gomel). Unknown to most observers, NATO was well aware of the new radar installation, which they referred to as Steel Yard.

Even from the earliest reports it was suspected they were tests of an over-the-horizon radar.[4], and this remained the most popular theory during the cold war. Several other theories were floated as well, including everything from jamming western broadcasts to submarine communications. The broadcast jamming theory was debunked early on when a monitoring survey showed that Radio Moscow and other pro-Soviet stations were just as badly affected by woodpecker interference as Western stations. More speculative explanations have also been offered, claiming it was a system for weather control or even an attempt at mass subconscious mind control.

As more information about the signal became available, its purpose as a radar signal became increasingly obvious. In particular, its signal contained a clearly recognizable structure in each pulse, which was eventually identified as a 5-bit pseudo-random binary sequence, 25 being 31-bits long, with a bit-width of 1 É s resulting in a 31 É s pulse.[5] This sequence is usable for a 100 É s chirped pulse amplification system, giving a resolution of 15 km (10 mi) (the distance light travels in 50 É s). When a second Woodpecker appeared, this one located in eastern Russia but also pointed toward the US and covering blank spots in the first system's pattern, this conclusion became inescapable.

In 1988, the Federal Communications Commission conducted a study on the Woodpecker signal. Data analysis showed an inter-pulse period of about 90 ms, a frequency range of 7 to 19 MHz, a bandwidth of 0.02 to 0.8 MHz, and typical transmission time of 7 minutes.

  • The signal was observed using three repetition rates: 10 Hz, 16 Hz and 20 Hz.
  • The most common rate was 10 Hz, while the 16 Hz and 20 Hz modes were rather rare.
  • The pulses transmitted by the woodpecker had a wide bandwidth, typically 40 kHz.


Starting in the late 1980s, even as the FCC was publishing studies of the signal, the signals became less frequent, and in 1989 disappeared altogether. Although the reasons for the eventual shutdown of the Duga-3 systems have not been made public, the changing strategic balance with the fall of the cold war in the late 1980s likely had a major part to play. Another factor was the success of the US-KS early-warning satellites, which entered preliminary service in the early 1980s, and by this time had grown into a complete network. The satellite system provides immediate, direct and highly secure warnings, whereas any radar-based system is subject to jamming, and the effectiveness of OTH systems also subject to atmospheric conditions.

According to some reports, the Komsomolsk-na-Amure installation in Siberia was taken off combat alert duty in November 1989, and some of its equipment was subsequently scrapped. Google Maps photography of the area shows that the antenna has been removed. The original Duga-3 site lies within the 30 kilometer Zone of Alienation around the Chernobyl power plant. It appears to have been permanently deactivated, since their continued maintenance did not figure in the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine over the active early warning radars at Mukachevo and Sevastopol. The antenna still stands, however, and has been used by amateurs as a transmission tower (using their own antennas) and has been extensively photographed. Images of the Gomel installation.



  1. ^ Sean O'Connor. Russian Strategic Defense - Part 2, The ABM Network.
  2. ^ Dave Finley. "Radio hams do battle with 'Russian Woodpecker'", 7 July 1982. Retrieved on 15 June 2007. 
  3. ^ David L. Wilson (Summer 1985). "The Russian Woodpecker... A Closer Look". Monitoring Times. Retrieved on 15 June 2007.?
  4. ^ (February 1977) "Mystery Soviet over-the-horizon tests". Wireless World: 53. Retrieved on 15 June 2007.?
  5. ^ J.P. Martinez (April 1982). "Letter from J. P. Martinez". Wireless World: 89. Retrieved on 15 June 2007.?

Further reading

  • Headrick, James M., Looking over the horizon , IEEE Spectrum, pp. 36 - 39 (July 1990).
  • Headrick, James M. and Skolnik, Merrill I., Over-the-horizon radar in the HF band, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 62, no. 6 pp. 664 - 673 (June 1974).
  • Headrick, James M., Ch. 24: "HF over-the-horizon radar," in: Radar Handbook, 2nd ed., Merrill I. Skolnik, ed. [New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990].
  • Kosolov, A. A., ed. Fundamentals of Over-the-Horizon Radar (translated by W. F. Barton) [ Norton, Mass.: Artech House, 1987].

External links

(8) Nikola Tesla Patents Top

Nikola Tesla Patents Early pioneer in electrochemical science and engineering Corrosion information hub: The Corrosion Doctor's Web site
Nikola Tesla made his first discoveries and inventions on the eighties of the last century. Searching for a noncommutator motor which would have eliminated major defects of Graham's direct current motor, in 1882 Tesla brilliantly invented the multiphase alternating current induction motor. At the same time this motor was the solution which made long-distance energy transmission possible, due to the possibility of transforming alternating currents into high voltage for more efficient transmission and low voltage for practical use.

In the following two years Tesla made futile efforts to arouse interest in European experts and ensure funds for realization of the new system of electric power generation, transmission and utilization. Finally, in 1884, he went to the USA with the recommendation from his employer in Edison's Paris branch. Edison, who was already famous and rich owing to his numerous patents and a series of inventions, immediately offered a job to Tesla, but was not interested in his alternating current, system. So their brief encounter ended and Tesla went his own way without Edison's encouragement and understanding.

After a seven-year break Tesla recommenced applying for patents, but this time in the field of turbines, pumps, fluids, lightning protectors, flow-meters and speed indicators. The majority of these patents were applied for in 1916. 'The last two patents Tesla applied for in the USA in 1921 and 1927 were in the domain of avionics.

The total number of patents issued to Nikola Tesla in the USA according to the evidence of the Nikola Tesla Museum in Belgrade amounted to 112. Here are 113 you can read by downloading the Acrobat files Plus additional British and Canadian Patents you never heard of:

  1. US Patent 11,865 Method Of Insulating Electric Conductors
  2. US Patent 334,823 Commutator For Dynamo-Electric Machines
  3. US Patent 335,786 Electric-Arc Lamp
  4. US Patent 335,787 Electric-Arc Lamp
  5. US Patent 336,961 Regulator For Dynamo-Electric Machines
  6. US Patent 336,962 Regulator For Dynamo-Electric Machines
  7. US Patent 350,954 Regulator For Dynamo-Electric Machines
  8. US Patent 359,748 Dynamo-Electric Machine
  9. US Patent 381,968 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  10. US Patent 381,969 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  11. US Patent 381,970 System Of Electrical Distribution
  12. US Patent 382,279 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  13. US Patent 382,280 Electrical Transmission Of Power
  14. US Patent 382,281 Electrical Transmission Of Power
  15. US Patent 382,282 Method Of Converting And Distributing Electric Currents
  16. US Patent 382,845 Commutator For Dynamo-Electric Machines
  17. US Patent 390,413 System Of Electrical Distribution
  18. US Patent 390,414 Dynamo-Electric Machine
  19. US Patent 390,415 Dynamo-Electric Machine Or Motor
  20. US Patent 390,721 Dynamo-Electric Machine
  21. US Patent 390,820 Regulator For Alternate-Current Motors
  22. US Patent 396,121 Thermo-Magnetic Motor
  23. US Patent 401,520 Method Of Operating Electro-Magnetic Motors
  24. US Patent 405,858 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  25. US Patent 405,859 Method Of Electrical Power Transmission
  26. US Patent 406,968 Dynamo-Electric Machine
  27. US Patent 413,353 Method Of Obtaining Direct From Alternating Currents
  28. US Patent 416,191 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  29. US Patent 416,192 Method Of Operating Electro-Magnetic Motors
  30. US Patent 416,193 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  31. US Patent 416,194 Electric Motor
  32. US Patent 416,195 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  33. US Patent 417,794 Armature For Electric Machines
  34. US Patent 418,248 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  35. US Patent 424,036 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  36. US Patent 428,057 Pyromagneto-Electric Generator
  37. US Patent 433,700 Alternating-Current Electro-Magnetic Motor
  38. US Patent 433,701 Alternating-Current Motor
  39. US Patent 433,702 Electrical Transformer Or Induction Device
  40. US Patent 433,703 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  41. US Patent 445,207 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  42. US Patent 447,920 Method Of Operating Arc-Lamps
  43. US Patent 447,921 Alternating Electric Current Generator
  44. US Patent 454,622 System Of Electric Lighting
  45. US Patent 455,067 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  46. US Patent 455,068 Electrical Meter
  47. US Patent 455,069 Electric Incandescent Lamp
  48. US Patent 459,772 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  49. US Patent 462,418 Method Of And Apparatus For Electrical Conversion And Distribution
  50. US Patent 464,666 Electro-Magnetic Motor
  51. US Patent 464,667 Electrical Condenser
  52. US Patent 487,796 System Of Electrical Transmission Of Power
  53. US Patent 511,559 Electrical Transmission Of Power
  54. US Patent 511,560 System Of Electrical Power Transmission
  55. US Patent 511,915 Electrical Transmission Of Power
  56. US Patent 511,916 Electric Generator
  57. US Patent 512,340 (HTML) Coil For Electro-magnets
  58. US Patent 512,340 (PDF) Coil For Electro-Magnets
  59. US Patent 514,167 Electrical Conductor
  60. US Patent 514,168 Means For Generating Electric Currents
  61. US Patent 514,169 Reciprocating Engine
  62. US Patent 514,170 Incandescent Electric Light
  63. US Patent 514,972 Electric Railway System
  64. US Patent 514,973 Electrical Meter
  65. US Patent 517,900 Steam Engine
  66. US Patent 524,426 Electromagnetic Motor
  67. US Patent 555,190 Alternating Motor
  68. US Patent 567,818 Electrical Condenser
  69. US Patent 568,176 Apparatus For Producing Electric Currents Of High Frequency And Potential
  70. US Patent 568,177 Apparatus For Producing Ozone
  71. US Patent 568,178 Method Of Regulating Apparatus For Producing Electric Currents Of High Frequency
  72. US Patent 568,179 Method Of And Apparatus For Producing Currents Of High Frequency
  73. US Patent 568,180 Apparatus For Producing Electrical Currents Of High Frequency
  74. US Patent 577,670 Apparatus For Producing Electric Currents Of High Frequency
  75. US Patent 577,671 Manufacture Of Electrical Condensors, Coils And Similar Devices
  76. US Patent 583,953 Apparatus For Producing Currents Of High Frequency
  77. US Patent 593,138 Electrical Transformer
  78. US Patent 609,245 Electrical Circuit Controller
  79. US Patent 609,246 Electric Circuit Controller
  80. US Patent 609,247 Electric Circuit Controller
  81. US Patent 609,248 Electric Circuit Controller
  82. US Patent 609,249 Electric Circuit Controller
  83. US Patent 609,250 Electrical Igniter For Gas Engines
  84. US Patent 609,251 Electric Circuit Controller
  85. US Patent 611,719 Electrical Circuit Controller
  86. US Patent 613,735 Electric Circuit Controller
  87. US Patent 613,809 Method Of And Apparatus For Controlling Mechanism Of Moving Vessels Or Vehicles
  88. US Patent 645,576 System Of Transmission Of Electrical Energy
  89. US Patent 649,621 Apparatus For Transmission Of Electrical Energy
  90. US Patent 655,838 Method Of Insulating Electric Conductors
  91. US Patent 685,012 Means For Increasing The Intensity Of Electrical Oscillations
  92. US Patent 685,953 Method Of Intensifying And Utilizing Effects Transmitted Through Natural Media
  93. US Patent 685,954 Method Of Utilizing Effects Transmitted Through Natural Media
  94. US Patent 685,955 Apparatus For Utilizing Effects Transmitted From A Distance To A Receiving Device Through Natural Media
  95. US Patent 685,956 Apparatus For Utilizing Effects Transmitted Through Natural Media
  96. US Patent 685,957 Apparatus For The Utilization of Radiant Energy
  97. US Patent 685,958 Method Of Utilizing of Radiant Energy
  98. US Patent 723,188 Method Of Signaling
  99. US Patent 725,605 System Of Signaling
  100. US Patent 787,412 Art Of Transmitting Electrical Energy Through The Natural Mediums
  101. US Patent 1,061,142 Fluid Propulsion
  102. US Patent 1,061,206 Turbine
  103. US Patent 1,113,716 Fountain
  104. US Patent 1,119,732 Apparatus For Transmitting Eleectrical Energy
  105. US Patent 1,209,359 Speed Indicator
  106. US Patent 1,266,175 Lightning Protector
  107. US Patent 1,274,816 Speed Indicator
  108. US Patent 1,314,718 Ship's Log
  109. US Patent 1,329,559 Valvular Conduit
  110. US Patent 1,365,547 Flow Meter
  111. US Patent 1,402,025 Frequency Meter
  112. US Patent 1,655,113 Method Of Aerial Transportation
  113. US Patent 1,655,114 Apparatus For Aerial Transportation
  114. British Patent 1,877 Improvements in Electric Lamps
  115. British Patent 2,801 Improvements in Reciprocating Engines and Means for Regulating the Period of the same
  116. British Patent 2,812 Improvements in Methods of and Apparatus for the Generation of Electric Currents of Defined Period
  117. British Patent 2,975 Improvements in Dynamo Electric Machines
  118. British Patent 6,481 Improvements relating to the Electrical Transmission of Power and to Apparatus therefor
  119. British Patent 6,502 Improvements relating to the Generation and Distribution of Electric Currents and to Apparatus therefor
  120. British Patent 6,527 Improvements relating to Electro-motors
  121. British Patent 8,200 Improvements relating to the Transmission of Electrical Energy
  122. British Patent 8,575 Improved Methods of and Apparatus for Generating and Utilizing Electric Energy for Lighting Purposes
  123. British Patent 11,293 Improvements relating to the Utilization of Electromagnetic, Light, or other like Radiations Effects or Disturbances transmitted through the Natural Media and to Apparatus therefor
  124. British Patent 11,473 Improvements in Alternating Current Electro-magnetic Motors
  125. British Patent 13,563 Improvements in, and relating to, the Transmission of Electrical Energy
  126. British Patent 14,550 Improvements relating to the Insulation of Electric Conductors
  127. British Patent 14,579 Improvements in and relating to the Transmission of Electrical Energy
  128. British Patent 16,709 Improvements relating to the Conversion of Alternating into Direct Electric Currents
  129. British Patent 19,420 Improvements in Alternating Current Electro-magnetic Motors
  130. British Patent 19,426 Improvements in the Construction and Mode of Operating Alternating Current Motors
  131. Canadian Patent 24,033 Improvements in Dynamo Electric Machines
  132. Canadian Patent 29,537 Improvements in Methods of and Apparatus for the Electrical Transmission of Power
  133. Canadian Patent 30,172 Improvements in Methods of and Apparatus for Converting and Distributing Electric Currents
  134. Canadian Patent 33,317 Improvements in Methods and Apparatus for Converting Alternating into Direct Currents
  135. Canadian Patent 135,174 Improvements in Fluid Propulsion (Tesla Pump)
  136. Canadian Patent 142,352 Improvement in the Art of Transmitting Electrical Energy Through the Natural Mediums

Other pages on Tesla:  Article, Biography Part One, Biography Part Two, Patents, Photographs, Statue, Transmitter

Other biographies: Aldini, Ampère, Arrhenius, Avogadro, Bacon, Berzelius, Boltzmann, Boyle, Bunsen, Callan, Carnot, Cavendish, Coulomb, Daniell, Davy, Debye, Dillon, Dow, Edison, Einstein, EvansFaraday, Fick, Fontana, Franklin, Galvani, Gauss, Gibbs, Gilbert, Grove, Guericke, Hall, Helmholtz, Héroult, Hertz, Hoar, Joule, LaQue, Leclanché, Mendeleev, Millikan, Musschenbroek, Nernst, Newton, Ohm, Ørsted, Parkins, Planté, Poisson, Pourbaix, Reynolds, Ritter, Speller, Stokes, Tesla, Thomson, Uhlig, Volta, Watt, Weston

Figure xx. Nikola Tesla Patents
Retrieved from

(9) The Hutchison Effect -- An Explanation Top

Figure xx. T

(10) The Hutchison Effect -- An Explanation Top

Figure xx. T

(11) The Hutchison Effect -- An Explanation Top

Figure xx. T

(12) Casimir Force Top

Physicists have 'solved' mystery of levitation

By Roger Highfield, Science Editor
Last Updated: 1:41am BST 08/08/2007

Levitation has been elevated from being pure science fiction to science fact, according to a study reported today by physicists.

In theory the discovery could be used to levitate a person
(after 9/11/01) Source:
In earlier work the same team of theoretical physicists showed that invisibility cloaks are feasible.

Now, in another report that sounds like it comes out of the pages of a Harry Potter book, the University of St Andrews team has created an 'incredible levitation effects' by engineering the force of nature which normally causes objects to stick together.

Professor Ulf Leonhardt and Dr Thomas Philbin, from the University of St Andrews in Scotland, have worked out a way of reversing this pheneomenon, known as the Casimir force, so that it repels instead of attracts.

Their discovery could ultimately lead to frictionless micro-machines with moving parts that levitate But they say that, in principle at least, the same effect could be used to levitate bigger objects too, even a person.

The Casimir force is a consequence of quantum mechanics, the theory that describes the world of atoms and subatomic particles that is not only the most successful theory of physics but also the most baffling.

The force is due to neither electrical charge or gravity, for example, but the fluctuations in all-pervasive energy fields in the intervening empty space between the objects and is one reason atoms stick together, also explaining a "dry glue" effect that enables a gecko to walk across a ceiling.

Now, using a special lens of a kind that has already been built, Prof Ulf Leonhardt and Dr Thomas Philbin report in the New Journal of Physics they can engineer the Casimir force to repel, rather than attact.

Because the Casimir force causes problems for nanotechnologists, who are trying to build electrical circuits and tiny mechanical devices on silicon chips, among other things, the team believes the feat could initially be used to stop tiny objects from sticking to each other.

Prof Leonhardt explained,

"The Casimir force is the ultimate cause of friction in the n

ano-world, in particular in some microelectromechanical systems.

Such systems already play an important role - for example tiny mechanical devices which triggers a car airbag to inflate or those which power tiny 'lab on chip' devices used for drugs testing or chemical analysis.

Micro or nano machines could run smoother and with less or no friction at all if one can manipulate the force."

Though it is possible to levitate objects as big as humans, scientists are a long way off developing the technology for such feats, said Dr Philbin.

The practicalities of designing the lens to do this are daunting but not impossible and levitation "could happen over quite a distance".

Prof Leonhardt leads one of four teams - three of them in Britain - to have put forward a theory in a peer-reviewed journal to achieve invisibility by making light waves flow around an object - just as a river flows undisturbed around a smooth rock.

Figure xx. Physicists have 'solved' mystery of levitation
By Roger Highfield, Science Editor, 08/08/2007
(8/08/07) Source:

(13) The "New" Solar Power, by Eugene F. Mallove, Sc.D. Top

ISSUE 53, 2004 o I n f i n i t e E n e r g y
The "New" Solar Power
by Eugene F. Mallove, Sc.D.
In the fast-moving, technologically gimmicky world of the early twenty-first century there are many things that are new "under the Sun." But there is also something very old coming from the Sun, which can now be seen in a new light—pardon the pun. For the very first time perhaps, we may be beginning to see the Sun’s radiation in its true light, and very tangibly so. This is the evidence: experiments which demonstrate the capture of solar power around-the clock, solar power by day and solar power by night. No, the world hasn’t stopped turning on its axis, so how can that be? Solar power captured at nighttime too? Yes—evidently extracted from unsuspected stores of energy, which are charged up by solar radiation, but certainly not in ways that modern physics has understood. This is a kind of widely available latent heat which is probably being observed, in part or in whole, in other types of excess energy new energy experiments as well. One thinks in particular of those carried out with atmospheric-arc or water-arc discharges, by Peter and Neal Graneau and their colleagues. But the energy release mechanism may well play a role in electrochemical "cold fusion" experiments as well, giving rise not only to some of the excess heat but to nuclear changes as well.

Figure 6. Water-arc discharge (not part of original article)
Figure 7. Water-arc discharge (not part of original article)

This "new" solar power should be of much more than passing interest to the conventional solar power industry with its focus on photovoltaic cells and thermal conversion solar power collection. There is simply no conventional way in which solar energy can be captured around-the-clock (with the exception perhaps of chancy wind power, in particular locations). As an example, the now defunct Federally supported "Solar Two" experimental installation, a beautiful image of which appears on the cover of this issue of Infinite Energy, employs some 2,000 planar mirrors to actively track the Sun and focus sunlight on the central power tower. Within the glowing cylinder atop the tower, molten salts are heated and begin the first stage of heat transfer toward steam production and then electric power generation. Yet this array is as good as derelict junk during the nighttime. Ditto for every photovoltaic array and every other solar thermal installation worldwide; there is no energy capture at night.

In this issue, an article appears to which this editor has contributed, with Dr. Paulo and Alexandra Correa as lead authors and investigators, "Power Performance of Stirling Motors Driven from Modified Orgone Accumulators" (p. 9). It discusses the mechanical calibration of the power output of precision Stirling engines, whose working fluid is air—external heat source engines which have been known since 1816. The paper aims at determining the internal thermal power evolution characteristics of certain contiguous metal Faraday cages that are covered with several alternating dielectric and steel-wool layers—the so-called "orgone accumulators" (ORACs) first investigated by Wilhelm Reich in the 1940s.

Of course, conventional physics considers it a priori preposterous that such an enclosed plenum could manifest any sort of new energy, from within. Yet for over sixty years there has been significant evidence of thermal anomalies associated with Faraday cages, a phenomenon that Reich brought to Albert Einstein’s attention in early 1941, but with long-term consequences unfortunately resembling roughly those attending the "cold fusion" announcement of 1989.1,2 The metal Faraday cage at the core, with or without its exterior coatings, could never be expected by conventional understanding to evidence any unusual energy draw from without or energy generation from within. The only energy that would be available to such an enclosure, modern physics claims, would have to be derived from electromagnetic radiation from the environment—sourced directly or indirectly from the Sun. (RF radiation from artificial terrestrial sources having been definitively ruled out as explanations of the thermal effects discussed—by orders of magnitude and by direct measurement with RF meters).

Now the particular experiment in the paper in this issue of IE gives some indication already of the potential for around the- clock operation of the MM6 Stirling engine (from American Stirling Corp.) sitting atop a modified orgone accumulator (see construction and other details in References 3 and 4). The "hybrid ORAC" (HYBORAC), with its Stirling motor, started running during daylight hours in Toronto, Canada on May 19, 2003 and ran some 20.5 hours (until 4:00 a.m.). It output (against friction) a daytime mean power of 125 mW and a nighttime mean power of 25 mW. Given the tiny calculated average Carnot efficiency (near 4.3%) of such a Stirling motor under the experimental temperature conditions, there had to be provided at the Stirling engine hot plate a mean of at least 1.75 watts of continuous sensible thermal flux (probably much more thermal flux, since the engine was probably far from Carnot efficient in its operation). The real shocker is that this kind of average minimum power evolved from within the HYBORAC’s Faraday cage—1.75 watts—is on the order of or greater than 100 times the sensible thermal flux that the kinetic theory of heat specifies could have transited through that 8- inch metal cube under these conditions!

With a design improvement made by the Correas to the HYBORAC/Stirling (proprietary to them, but not increasing the frontal area exposed to the Sun), they were able to run the Stirling from solar environmental energy—uninterrupted for 48 hours, i.e. over two night cycles (June 15-16, 2003).

They have reported this in Reference 5, which is already available on their website. Nothing would have precluded continuous operation for many more days. This really is around-the-clock free power. In the Reference 5 work, the Correas went beyond mechanical calibrations in their assessment of the Stirling performance: they employed electrical resistance heater activation of the MM6 engine to prove that two watts of average power had to be applied to the hot plate of the engine for the mean around-the-clock engine speed of 123 rpm to be achieved! The corresponding kinetic theory of heat prediction would be a mere 8 to 10 milliwatts of thermal influx into the Faraday cage.

Now let us consider the implications of these results, first in terms of technological directions that might be taken in the field of solar power, and second, in terms of the new physics that is evidently required to explain such anomalous results. Our paper in this issue of Infinite Energy suggests that in the May 19, 2003 experiment, the Stirling engine puts out at least 200% more work-equivalent energy than typical photovoltaics (with equivalent area) output in the form of electric energy during an equivalent day. The implication is not that this particular Stirling-HYBORAC combination is better already today, in a utilitarian sense, than the electricity- producing photovoltaic array, but that there is the potential for using ORAC/Stirling designs (or perhaps modified ORACS with advanced types of solid-state converters) to capture much more solar-sourced energy than PV arrays.

The testing of June 15-16, 2003 with the incrementally improved-design HYBORAC/Stirling5 already shows substantial gains in performance. The Correas conclude that the assembly put out between 2.75x and 3.15x more power during the 48-hour test than a photovoltaic array of equivalent area. During peak diurnal solar activity when the MM6 Stirling hit angular speeds greater than 160 rpm, the performance reached 5.5x photovoltaic performance. They state that they have also demonstrated efficiencies 150% greater than passive solar energy capture techniques.

Driving Stirling heat engines with solar power is nothing new; this was done as far back as the 1930s, but not of course around-the-clock and not employing ORAC technology. From my perspective, however, the most important implication of this new work is its proof that even such a supposedly secure area of physics as blackbody radiation theory and electromagnetism is almost certainly deeply flawed at its roots. How else can it be explained that a metallic enclosure can develop within it far more power than the ambient supposed electromagnetic radiation field would allow? The very nature of light is at issue, as it has been for hundreds of years. We recall the crisis about the spectrum of blackbody radiation as the twentieth century dawned, when Max Planck’s energy quantization "fix" was put in to make the high frequency light "ultraviolet catastrophe" disappear. Well, the twentieth century’s proclaimed success with the wave-particle duality concept within quantum mechanics, which followed from the Planckian fix, turns out to be superficial at best. The amalgamated concept of waves and photon energy packets crossing space will not pass muster and the final theory of light is almost certainly not as given in late-twentieth century texts.6

Conventional theory takes the Sun as the equivalent of a nearly ideal blackbody radiator with an absolute temperature at its luminous emission surface of about 5,750 K—though the higher reaches of its coronal atmosphere are on the order of 1,000,000 K (another unresolved mystery about the Sun, by the way).7 It is from this orb of high temperature plasma material (at roughly 5,750 K) that supposed spectrum of electromagnetic radiation crosses a local patch of space-time—disembodied electric and magnetic field vectors of such EM radiation oscillating furiously as transverse waves. Upon reaching our planet, the EM radiation is partially reflected and partially absorbed by the constituents of the atmosphere. Such a tidy picture has been explored and explained with much confidence by so many texts.7 How can there be anything fundamentally wrong with it? Easy! That is like asking, "How there can be anything fundamentally wrong with twentieth century models of atomic structure?" Yet a look at the large body of work in new hydrogen physics energy ( and www.blacklightpower. com) is testament that these very fundamental accepted structures are nearly certain to be very flawed approximations.

My colleagues, the Correas, believe that for their part they have developed firm experimental evidence, which they have linked with their quantitative AToS theory (Aetherometric Theory of Synchronicity), that the Sun in fact radiates longitudinal Tesla-waves, another term for which is "ambipolar massfree radiation," which are not limited to speed c. Their work with Tesla induction coils and Faraday cages, among other devices, suggests that what emanates from Tesla coils is not electromagnetic radiation at all. Moreover, what does come from such coils has been shown by them in various published monographs to produce within Faraday cages heating effects and lumination phenomena inside cage-enclosed vacuum tubes. These effects are indicative, they say, of how the Sun’s basic emanation—energetic Tesla waves—interact with the stratified terrestrial atmosphere, and in turn with the Faraday cages that are the subject of the present HYBORAC/Stirling work. These atmosphere-attenuated waves from the Sun actually appear to penetrate the metal cages. Furthermore, there is strong reason to believe that molecular "atmospheres" of mass-free energy are transduced from a latent heat form within Faraday cages and the resultant sensible heat produced drives the affixed Stirling engine in the experiments. Without recasting electrons and other supposed "point-like" particles as extended aether energy structures, such as twisting and spinning toroids, it would be difficult to understand where these new energy storage modes might reside, so the Correa theory encompasses such changes too.

That is but a rough picture of what they have theorized, but the theory makes predictions with highly quantitative results that have many important implications not only for atmospheric physics but for cosmology as well. They have re-cast blackbody radiation theory with an underlying frequency spectrum of aether energy waves that gives rise to what blackbody theory only incompletely suggests.8 This restructuring, in turn, bears on atmospheric cycles of water, ozone, and oxygen,9 as well as on the cosmic microwave energy spectrum,10 which the Physics Establishment insists is "proof" of an instantaneous "Big Bang" cosmic origin 13.7 billion years ago. For this reason and with much other evidence in hand, the cosmic microwave spectrum is seen to be no such proof at all of the "Big Bang."11

There is little doubt that the Sun has been shining for a very, very long time and providing the life-giving energy that drives the metabolic food chain of all life on Earth (deep subterranean microbial life perhaps excepted.) Modern physics

thinks that it knows just about everything it needs to know about this glowing source of life, just as it imagines that it knows everything about fusion reactions from studying and postulating about the presumed reactions within Sol and other stars. Yet in truth, our knowledge about the innermost reactions within matter—and even about light itself—is just beginning. Much "firm" knowledge is at great risk, as discoveries before and after 1989 have shown. Let us follow the path of the light of this new knowledge as a broadly-based New Energy Age dawns. Perhaps solar power enthusiasts, who heretofore have been reluctant to join the rag-tag New Energy revolution, may now find good reason to look into it and then join forces with us.

1. Correa, P. and Correa, A. 2001. "The Reproducible Thermal Anomaly of the Reich-Einstein Experiment Under Limit Conditions," Infinite Energy, 7, 37, 12-21.

2. Mallove, E. 2002. "Demonstrating Aether Energy," Infinite Energy, 7, 41, 6-8.

3. Correa, P. and Correa, A. 2002. "A Modified Orgone Accumulator (HYBORAC) as Drive for a Low Delta-T Stirling Engine (Part I)," Infinite Energy, 7, 41, 23-29 (also available as Monograph AS2-25 at

4. Correa, P. and Correa, A. 2002. "A Modified Orgone Accumulator (Complete HYBORAC) as a Nighttime Drive for a Low Delta-T Stirling Engine (Part II)," Infinite Energy, 7, 42, 41-48 (also available as Monograph AS2-26 at

5. Correa, P. and Correa, A. "Around-the-Clock Free Power from Improved HYBORACs Driving Low Delta-T Gamma Stirling Engines," ABRI Monograph, AS2-32 (available at

6. Eisberg, R. 1961. Fundamentals of Modern Physics, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

7. Motz, L. and Duveen, A. 1967. Essentials of Astronomy, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California.

8. Correa, P. and Correa, A. "The Indirect ‘Orgone Effect’ of Tesla Radiation: Ambipolar Aether and Blackbody Radiation Spectra," Akronos Publishing, Concord, Canada, Monograph AS2-17A.

9. Correa, P. and Correa, A. "Determination of the OR and DOR Energies, Frequencies, and Wavelengths Driving the Atmospheric Allotropic Cycle of Oxygen, Ozone, and Water," Akronos Publishing, Concord, Canada, Monograph AS2-17B.

10. Correa, P. and Correa, A. "The Microwave Cosmic Background Radiation (mCBR) as Evidence for Cosmological Creation of Electrons with Minimum Kinetic Energy and for a Pervasive Cosmic Spectrum of Ambipolar Massfree Radiation," Akronos Publishing, Concord, Canada, Monograph AS2-17C.

11. Infinite Energy special issue, "The Big Bang Busted: Overwhelming Evidence Rejects the Theory That ‘Everyone’ Accepts. How the Big Bang Myth Survives, and What Can Replace It," Vol. 8, No. 46.

Figure 5.
(xxx) Source: pdf: (archived)

Figure 8.

(xxx) Source: Fire from Ice, by Eugene Mallove

Figure 9. Tritium at the WTC
(xxx) Source: pdf: (archived):

Thomas Cahill, a University of California - Davis professor, was hired for the job sometime in early October. It's not clear when his first samples were gathered. Day 28 on the chart below would be about October 9, 2001. (reference to be posted)

(14) Transmutation, The Alchemist Dream Come True Top

The worblem

The most precal issue in most countries.

Figure xx. T

(15) Forum Discussions Top

The worblem

The most precal issue in most countries.

Figure xx. T

(15) From Cold Fusion to Condensed Matter Nuclear Science Top

From Cold F

ISIS Prewhereby the nuclei of lighon atoms and nuclei.)

Atoms and nuclei

An atoms D and T). 

The pvarges attract.

As c

Figure xx. T

(16) Port Authority to pay Silverstein after delays Top

Figure xx. T

First Responder Statements

Lift Top

First Responder Statement: RENE DAVILA

Figure xx. T

Audio Files
· Index
· Page 1
· Page 2
· Page 3
· Page 4
· Page 5
· Page 6
· Page 7
· Page 8
12 December 2007
Interview: John Hutchison is the guest of Charles Giuliani
on "The Truth Hertz" on republicbroadcasting: Listen
edited: (mp3)
12-2 PM/EST, Live:

6 December 2007
Interview: Judy Wood is the guest of Jim Fetzer
on "The Dynamic Duo" Listen
edited: (mp3)
4-6 PM/EDT on GCN: (ch. 4)

The Hutchison Effect -- An Explanation
Casimir Force
You're on Your Own When You Violate the Laws of Physics (and Don’t Take Notes)

First Responder Statements

The Hutchison Effect -- An Explanation

Physicists have 'solved' mystery of levitation

Transmutation, The Alchemist Dream Come True

From Cold Fusion to Condensed Matter Nuclear Science

Figure other. I
(after 9/11/01) Source:

More Information Top

More information
Please don't click on these links until the page is public.
It will leave a trail back here.
Hutchison Effect





Hutchison Effect Archive by Leonard Norrgard. 
Dr. John Hutchison - The Hutchison Effect.
John Hutchison's Web Page.
The Dirt Cheap Rocks of John Hutchison.
How to Explain Space Energy?
The Hutchison Effect - An Explanation by Mark A. Solis.
Artificially Created Paranormal Phenomena of John Hutchison.
Charge Clusters In Action by Ken Shoulders. PDF file:
John Hutchison, The Wild Scientist From Vancouver:
You're on Your Own When You Violate the Laws of Physics (and Don't Take Notes) by John Hutchison.
The Hutchison File, or archived (searchable)

Acknowledgements Top

Many thanks to those who have helped us put this together
Please don't click on these links until the page is public.
It will leave a trail back here.
Andrew Johnson
A Touch of The Hidden Hand?
The New "9-11 Hijackers"?
Russ Gerst

9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline

Morgan Reynolds

 Continue to next page.

 Continue to next page.

Top homepage
WTC & Hutch (JJ)
Erin & Field (erin)
Billiard Balls
Qui Tam Case
Why Indeed
Index JJ1 JJ2
JJ 3
JJ4 JJ 5 JJ6 JJ7 JJ8
Appendix_1 Appendix_2 Appendix_3
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this webpage are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This webpage has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

© 2006-2008 Judy Wood and the author above. All rights reserved.