Is this building "collapsing", or is it turning to dust?

The Key Evidence (Videos)
The Journal of 9/11 Research
9/11 Issues
Yes, there are issues with 9/11!!!

  "A time comes when silence is betrayal." 
- Martin Luther King
Old Front Page Accessible By Clicking Here
This site is an archive of evidence relating to the events at the World Trade Centre Complex on and after Sept 11th 2001. The evidence shows that the Official Story of 9/11 is completely untrue. There is a great deal of discussion about what did and did not happenon 9/11, so please study carefully the evidence presented here - much of which has been submitted as part of a Qui Tam Case. The general conclusions drawn from a study of this evidence are of profound and fundamental importance to the future of those of us living here on planet Earth. 

Appeal: Please study this information carefully and share it with as many people as you can. 

This will become the new home page, soon.


Click pictures to see detailed information or see links at top.


To acquire knowledge, one must study;
but to acquire wisdom, one must observe.
Marilyn Vos Savant, Writer

Let us observe.

Molecular Dissociation: from Dust to Dirt
(brought to you by the Star Wars Program)

How is it that the towers disappeared at a rate close to the rate of freefall? How can a steel structure fail so catastrophically?

This is an analysis of the collapse time, which may suit more technically minded people. For those interested in Conservation of Momentum issues, please read to the very end of this analysis.

What is causing the material to behave like "Alka Seltzer", as it turns to dust?
Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW)
(brought to you by the Star Wars Program)
How is it that most of the steel (not just the concrete) turned to dust? What caused this "dustification" process?
People are walking down the street admid a cloud of exceptionally fine dust. How was the dust made so fine, and what could explain its unusual behaviour?

What caused circular holes in the buildings and in the street? Where has the centre of WTC gone?

Where did they take the dirt? Why was dirt, or landfill material brought into the WTC complex?

"Toasted Cars" - What caused the damage to these cars? On the picture shown here, why is the door wilted, yet the rear tire is still inflated?

Why was dirt placed on top of the debris field - and even on top of wrecked vehicles?
This picture was taken before the destruction of WTC 7 (which can be seen in the background, to the left of the fuming cloud). Where is the debris from WTC 1 & 2? If the ground is hot, then why is the man walking across?

Why is smoke seemingly coming out of an entire side of WTC 7? Why was WTC 7's destruction so neat, with the rubble pile barely spilling across the street?
What is the white "smoke" that appears to be coming out of the entire surface of the south face of WTC1?
Bent Beams

Samples that John Hutchison has produced show very unusual effects on the metal – sometimes severe bending occurs

Hurricane Erin was “born” on about the 1st of September 2001, and travelled up towards NYC. Hurricane Erin was the closest to NYC on 9/11/01 and was the largest on this date (although wind speeds were greater the day before). Why?

Cars/Lift and Disintegration
Some WTC pictures show cars that are upside down.

(How?) One of the key effects John Hutchison has reproduced many times is a “levitation” or “anti-gravity” effect. Objects are sometimes seen to levitate or if they don’t, they disintegrate.

Katrina and Erin were of comparable size (Erin was bigger, by most measures), yet we heard almost nothing of the risk Erin posed near 9/11 compared to what we heard about Katrina. Why?

Toasted Metal & Effects

A number metal effects have been observed in samples from the WTC and these show similar features to some of the samples made by John Hutchison

A short comparison is drawn between some of the effects seen with the materials in collision in Tornados and hurricanes with the anomalous changes in materials seen with Hutchison Effect.


Sometimes, materials subjected to the Hutchison Effect seem to change at an elemental level – could this be the explanation for the rapid rusting – steel is turned into Iron?

It looks as if this car came gently to rest, without damaging or breaking the Wooden Fence - also, it does not seem to have any dents or serious body damage. How did this happen?

Source: mpg. (4.7 MB)
Weird Fires

The fires seen near the toasted cars don’t seem to ignite the paper. Some photos show firemen walking very or even through them. Are they “cold” fires?

1. Superheated pile/Molten metal – if there is molten metal in the pile, how can people be seen walking on the pile, and crawling around in the holes found in the subbasements as observed in pictures. How can hydraulics on the digging equipment seen crawling all over the debris operate above their hydraulics highest temp limits of 180F? Further, if water were sprayed on the hot pile, wouldn’t water from rain and broken water mains and fire hoses not exploded into steam? We never saw any of these things happen

2. Pile size – picture evidence from 9/11 shows that there were no piles above one story with vacant basements on sublevel one and below. If there is nothing below and no pile, where did the building go? There were inches and inches of dust. What caused this?

3. Burned out/toasted vehicles – what caused this. Cars sitting between cars that are perfectly fine are upside down. Others have missing engine compartments while gas tanks are in tact. Some sheet metal on cars is delaminated, door handles are missing and tremendous rusting is taking place.

4. Oxidation of steel – iron rusts quickly, steel does not. Tremendous evidence exists of the limited steel at the WTC is rusting, quite quickly.

5. Bankers Trust – what caused the gash, what caused the building to be repaired, then scuttled and torn down. Inner steel is rusting heavily

6. Dirt – why is dirt being hauled into the WTC complex to this day. It is mixed around and hauled out. Witnessed this in October of last year

7. Temporary PATH train station – why has it been replaced three times and continues to rust out as noted last October.

8. Windows of WFC – how is it that they were all broken (as if by blast debris) yet did not shatter or cause damage to the building fa&Mac217;ade.

"Experimental evidence is the truth theory must mimic."

Some of the principal evidence that must be explained:
  1. The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain by a free fall speed "collapse."
  2. They underwent mid-air pulverization and were turned to dust before they hit the ground.
  3. The protective bathtub was not significantly damaged by the destruction of the Twin Towers.
  4. The rail lines, the tunnels and most of the rail cars had only light damage, if any.
  5. The WTC underground mall survived well, witnessed by Warner Bros. Road Runner and friends. There were reports that "The Gap" was looted.
  6. The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on a comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition.
  7. The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not bottom up.
  8. The demolition of WTC7 was whisper quiet and the seismic signal was not significantly greater than background noise.
  9. The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.
  10. The upper 90 percent, approximately, of the inside of WTC7 was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.
  11. One file cabinet with folder dividers survived.
  12. No toilets survived or even recognizable portions of one.
  13. Windows of nearby buildings had circular and other odd-shaped holes in them.
  14. In addition to the odd window damage, the marble facade was completely missing from around WFC1 and WFC2 entry, with no other apparent structural damage.
  15. Fuzzballs, evidence that the dust continued to break down and become finer and finer.
  16. Truckloads of dirt were hauled in and hauled out of the WTC site, a pattern that continues to this day.
  17. Fuming of the dirt pile. Fuming decreased when watered, contrary to fumes caused by fire or heat.
  18. Fuzzyblobs, a hazy cloud that appeared to be around material being destroyed.
  19. The Swiss-Cheese appearance of steel beams and glass.
  20. Evidence of molecular dissociation and transmutation, as demonstrated by the near-instant rusting of affected steel.
  21. Weird fires. The appearance of fire, but without evidence of heating.
  22. Lack of high heat. Witnesses reported that the initial dust cloud felt cooler than ambient temperatures. No evidence of burned bodies.
  23. Columns were curled around a vertical axis like rolled-up carpets, where overloaded buckled beams should be bent around the horizontal axis.
  24. Office paper was densely spread throughout lower Manhattan, unburned, often along side cars that appeared to be burning.
  25. Vertical round holes were cut into buildings 4, 5 and 6, and into Liberty street in front of Bankers Trust, and into Vesey Street in front of WTC6, plus a cylindrical arc was cut into Bankers Trust.
  26. All planes except top secret missions were ordered down until 10:31 a.m. (when only military flights were allowed to resume), after both towers were destroyed, and only two minutes (120 seconds) after WTC 1 had been destroyed.
  27. Approximately 1,400 motor vehicles were towed away, toasted in strange ways, during the destruction of the Twin Towers.
  28. The order and method of destruction of each tower minimized damage to the bathtub and adjacent buildings.
  29. More damage was done to the bathtub by earth-moving equipment during the clean-up process than from the destruction of more than a million tons of buildings above it.
  30. Twin Tower control without damaging neighboring buildings, in fact all seriously damaged and destroyed buildings had a WTC prefix.
  31. The north wing of WTC 4 was left standing, neatly sliced from the main body which virtually disappeared.
  32. For more than seven years, regions in the ground under where the main body of WTC4 stood have continued to fume.
  33. The WTC1 and WTC2 rubble pile was far too small to account for the total mass of the buildings.
  34. The WTC7 rubble pile was too small for the total mass of the building and consisted of a lot of mud.
  35. Eyewitness testimony about toasted cars, instant disappearance of people by "unexplained" waves, a plane turning into a mid-air fireball, electrical power cut off moments before WTC 2 destruction, and the sound of explosions.
  36. Eyewitness testimony of Scott-pack explosions in fire trucks and fire trucks exploding that were parked near the WTC.
  37. There were many flipped cars in the neighborhood of the WTC complex near trees with full foliage.
  38. Magnetometer readings in Alaska recorded abrupt shifts in the earth's magnetic field with each of the events at the WTC on 9/11.
  39. Hurricane Erin, located just off Long Island on 9/11/01, went virtually unreported in the days leading up to 9/11, including omission of this Hurricane on the morning weather map, even though that portion of the Atlantic Ocean was shown on the map.
  40. Sillystring, the appearance of curious cork-screw trails.
  41. Uncanny similarities with the Hutchison Effect, where the Hutchison Effect exhibits all of the same phenomena listed above.

* Is it possible that such a technology exist? Since invention of the microwave for cooking in 1945 and lasers in 1955*, commercial and military development of directed-energy technology has proceeded apace, so use of directed-energy technology is likely to exist -- and the data tells us it does exist.

What explanations have been suggested to explain these phenomena?
Seven explanations have been identified:
  1. Natural causes such as earthquakes and hurricanes
  2. Arson
  3. The official theory of airplane impact, fires and weakened steel collapsing
  4. Conventional demolition with explosives such as RDX, dynamite, etc.
  5. Demolition via thermite or its variants
  6. Fission or fusion nukes (and clean bombs)
  7. Beam weapons, energy weapons, directed-energy weapons (DEW)

    (CCD-BiB) = "Conventional Controlled Demolition" with "Bombs in the Building"

Beam Weapons, Energy Weapons, and Directed Energy Weapons (DEW):

We have used the terms "beam weapons" and "directed energy weapons" to refer to unconventional weapons (exotic weapons) that are energy weapons. We broadly define DEW as Energy that is Directed and is used as a Weapon. The full range of these weapons is classified information, so we make no limits or distinction of categories within the realm of energy weapons, as doing so would imply specific knowledge of all that is available. In the following paragraph, we have listed some of the possibilities we are aware of.

Our critics have accused us of insisting that beam weapons did their damage from outer space, yet we make no claim about whether the directed energy weapon operated from a space-, air-, or ground-based platform. Nor do we make any claim about what wavelength(s) was used, what the source(s) of energy was, whether it involved interference of multiple beams, whether it involved sound waves, whether it involved sonoluminescence, whether it involved antimatter weapons, whether it involved scalar weapons, whether it was HAARP (more here and here), whether it involved a nuclear process (e.g. NDEW, more info), whether it involved conventional directed energy weapons (cDEW), whether it involved improvised directed energy weapons (iDEW), nor what kind of accelerator was used, nor do we claim to know what the serial numbers of the parts that were in the weapon(s).

What we do claim is that the evidence is consistent with the use of energy weapons that go well beyond the capabilities of conventional explosives and can be directed.

"When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."


Madison - 9/11 - The New Hiroshima

9/11-The New Hiroshima-Pt 1
Madison, Aug 2007
9/11-The New Hiroshima-Pt 2
Madison, Aug 2007

9/11 and the Hutchison Effect

WTC Destruction and the Hutchison Effect - 1Ambrose Lane, WPFW, 14th Jan 2008
WTC Destruction and the Hutchison Effect - 2Ambrose Lane, WPFW, 18th Jan 2008

9/11, Field Effects and Hurricane Erin

John Hutchison - The Hutchison Effect 
Seattle - 29th May 2008
9/11, Erin and Field Effects
 Seattle - 29th May 2008


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this webpage are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This webpage has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

© 2006-2008 Judy Wood and the author above. All rights reserved.