Bottom homepage
Dirt
Billiard Balls
Why Indeed
dirt 1
Alka-Seltzer
dirt 2
Fuzzballs
dirt 3
dirt
dirt 4
Cheetos

(Rust)
dirt 5
USGS
dirt 6
USGS2
dirt 7
humans
Appendix_1 Appendix_2 Appendix_3


WARNING: NOT YET FOR PUBLIC SHARING
(Please do not share until this warning is removed. Thanks!)


Molecular Dissociation: from Dust to Dirt

By

Judy Wood

This page last updated, May 17, 2006

This page is currently UNDER CONSTRUCTION
and is currently being updated.

[Note: References and Sources will be posted and figure numbers will be corrected (in sequential order) when this paper is finished .]

(originally posted: May 16, 2007)



Source: http://www.ehponline.org/members/2003/5930/5930.html

Environmental Health Perspectives

Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 111, Number 7, June 2003
Chemical Analysis of World Trade Center Fine Particulate Matter for Use in Toxicologic Assessment

John K. McGee,1 Lung Chi Chen,2 Mitchell D. Cohen,2 Glen R. Chee,2 Colette M. Prophete,2 Najwa Haykal-Coates,1 Shirley J. Wasson,3 Teri L. Conner,4 Daniel L. Costa,1 and Stephen H. Gavett1

1National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA; 2Nelson Institute of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, Tuxedo, New York, USA; 3National Risk Management Research Laboratory, and 4National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

Abstract

The catastrophic destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) on 11 September 2001 caused the release of high levels of airborne pollutants into the local environment. To assess the toxicity of fine particulate matter [particulate matter with a mass median aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 m (PM2.5) ], which may adversely affect the health of workers and residents in the area, we collected fallen dust samples on 12 and 13 September 2001 from sites within a half-mile of Ground Zero. Samples of WTC dust were sieved, aerosolized, and size-separated, and the PM2.5 fraction was isolated on filters. Here we report the chemical and physical properties of PM2.5 derived from these samples and compare them with PM2.5 fractions of three reference materials that range in toxicity from relatively inert to acutely toxic (Mt. St. Helens PM ; Washington, DC, ambient air PM ; and residual oil fly ash) . X-ray diffraction of very coarse sieved WTC PM (< 53 m) identified calcium sulfate (gypsum) and calcium carbonate (calcite) as major components. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed that calcium-sulfur and calcium-carbon particles were also present in the WTC PM2.5 fraction. Analysis of WTC PM2.5 using X-ray fluorescence, neutron activation analysis, and inductively coupled plasma spectrometry showed high levels of calcium (range, 22-33%) and sulfur (37-43% as sulfate) and much lower levels of transition metals and other elements. Aqueous extracts of WTC PM2.5 were basic (pH range, 8.9-10.0) and had no evidence of significant bacterial contamination. Levels of carbon were relatively low, suggesting that combustion-derived particles did not form a significant fraction of these samples recovered in the immediate aftermath of the destruction of the towers. Because gypsum and calcite are known to cause irritation of the mucus membranes of the eyes and respiratory tract, inhalation of high doses of WTC PM2.5 could potentially cause toxic respiratory effects. Key words: , , , , , , , . Environ Health Perspect 111:972-980 (2003) .