Bottom | homepage |
|
|
|
|
At the time this article was being developed, many people expressed disbelief that energy weapons existed outside of science fiction until they were reminded of the Star Wars Program, also known as the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI)*. The name of this article was chosen as a reminder that energy weapons do exist and have been developed over 100 years. Most of this technology is classified information. It can also be assumed that such technology exists in multiple countries. The purpose of this article was to begin to identify the evidence of what happened on 9/11/01 that must be accounted for. In doing so, the evidence ruled out a Kinetic Energy Device (bombs, missiles, etc.) as the method of destruction as well as a gravity-driven "collapse."
*SDI was created by U.S. President Ronald Reagan on March 23, 1983.1 It is thought that SDI may have been first dubbed "Star Wars" by opponent Dr. Carol Rosin, a consultant and former spokeswoman for Wernher von Braun. However, Missile Defense Agency (MDA) historians attribute the term to a Washington Post article published March 24, 1983, the day after the Star Wars speech, which quoted Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy describing the proposal as "reckless Star Wars schemes."2 Before it was named the "Star Wars Program (SDI) in 1983, it was the Advanced Space Programs Development.3
12/12/10 -- Dr. Judy Wood
|
1Strategic Defense Initiative, Wikipedia, 2Sharon Watkins Lang. SMDC/ASTRAT Historical Office. "Where Do We Get Star Wars?", The Eagle. March 2007. 3 Robert M. Bowman, former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations. |
Jump to bus (Figure 5(a)) Jump to van (Figure 6(a)) Jump to policecar (Figure 7(a)) Jump to leg (Figure 8(a)) Jump to swamp (Figure 9(a)) |
Audio:
29 November 2006, Judy Wood narrates these pages web pages on |
These pictures are taken along the street that goes between the postal building and WTC7, and are about a block north of WTC7, before WTC7 "faints."
From album WTC Pictures by member cuoffrd
Figure 1(a). Looking up at the smoke |
Figure 1(b). |
Source website |
Figure 2(a). rubble w FDNY bkgrnd Why is there a hole in the street, here? Referring to Figure 3(a), below, it appears they were doing work here. However, that is a rather large hole to leave unattended with nearly no attempt to keep vehicles and pedestrians from falling in. The few boards that are there would provide very little protection. So, it is likely that this hole was being worked on the morning of 9/11/01, otherwise it would have had more protection. There appears to be very little debris on top of the boards while there the "dust" is rather deep in that area. So, perhaps they were knocked down after the majority of the debris had fallen. |
Figure 2(b). |
Source, website |
Figure 3(a). small fire |
Figure 3(b). |
Source |
Figure 4(a). Barclay St fire |
Figure 4(b). |
Source |
Bus Top
Figure 5(a). burned out cars and bus Consistently, they seem to have missing door handles. And the gas tanks don't appear to explode. |
Figure 5(b). |
Source |
Van Top
Figure 6(a). burned suv and mail truck |
Figure 6(b). |
Source |
Police Car Top
Figure 7(a). burned NYPD car Police car I've not seen before. Why the back end and not the front? |
Figure 7(b). |
Source |
Leg? Top
Figure 8(a). burned cars bus trucks and fire WTC7 looks REALLY good here! (It's the building on the right, a block away from where the camera person is standing.) It looks like those could be body parts on the sidewalk (arm or leg?). I believe this is after WTC1 goes poof, but am not sure. I have pictures from the next block up, next to WTC7, and it didn't look nearly as bad as this! So, I'm thinking that this part of the street got toasted when they did WTC1 and the other one (posted on http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html) was after WTC2 and before WTC1. |
Figure 8(b). |
Source |
Swamp Top
Figure 9(a). block with fire at end I think this is just before they did WTC7. Notice how empty the streets are, while they are flooded with water and lots of fire hoses. Obviously the water lines weren't busted! The traffic light in the distance appears to still have power. (9/11/01) |
Figure 9(b). |
Source |
Figure 9(c). WTC7, looking south, down W. Broadway. Source, 080.JPG, (entered 9/18/01) (picture probably taken 9/12/01 or the morning of 9/13/01, but no later than 9/13/01) |
Figure 9(d). WTC7, looking south, down W. Broadway. Source, 081.JPG, (entered 9/18/01) (picture probably taken 9/12/01 or the morning of 9/13/01, but no later than 9/13/01) |
|
Figure 9(d). "This is an interview by Diane Sawyer of a Fireman who witnessed these Melted cars, and he states that where these cars were, there were no Fires around!!!" I believe his is talking about W. Broadway. URL, (9/11/01) |
Figure 10(a). paper on street This is a look east down Park Place. |
Figure 10(b). Location of Burlington Coat Factory, 45 Park Pl, New York, NY |
Source |
Figure 11(a). fire from afar |
Figure 11(b). |
Source |
Figure 12(a). building ablaze After 2 went poof. Standing on Church street, looking south, with the postal building on hte right and the WTC4 remaining "stub" in the distance. |
Figure 12(b). |
Source |
Figure 13(a). close up building ablaze Maybe they set WTC5 on fire for a "smokescreen" after the fact? Why would this building be on fire so viscously and so FAST? |
Figure 13(b). |
Source |
Figure 14(a). look at bronze statue of man Is that a statue or is that a human? |
Figure 14(b). |
Source | Source |
www.prisonplanet.com The figure was a bronze statue named "Double Check," created by sculptor J. Seward Johnson, that sat on a park bench near the towers. The discovery of the statue shown below two days after 9/11 was subject of a CNN piece in December 2001. The statue became a shrine to victims of 9/11. |
Figure 15(a). flag | Figure 15(b). |
Source |
Figure 16(a). rubble close up | Figure 16(b). |
Source |
Figure 17(a). rescue workers | Figure 17(b). |
Source |
Figure 18(a). rescue workers at work | Figure 18(b). |
Source |
Figure 19(a). FDNY working | Figure 19(b). |
Source |
Figure firetruck. A badly damaged firetruck. Where did its engine go? The bottom of the tire has turned to goo below a distict horizontal line in the tire.
Source: |
Figure hazmat. A FDMY Hazmat truck in front of WTC6 on West Street. The remaining upper part of the truck has been peeled and evaporated in areas. The upper part of the cab is gone and the engine block seems to have disappeared. The photo was taken on 9/11 after WTC1 disappeared but before WTC7 collapsed.
(9/11/01) Source: |
Figure 66(e). Why would the front of this fire truck wilt?
Source: |
Figure 66(h). Is there something attractive about engine blocks? Why not gasoline fuel tanks?
Source: |
Figure 66(g). This fire seems to be very selective.
Source: |
Figure 66(i). A minivan is consumed by flames. The fire rages inside the vehicle, contained by the remaining windows. The fire appears more intense at the front where the engine is.
Source: |
Figure onfire1. The tires and even the pavement under the car are on fire. The windows appear to be intact with no visible interior fire. There is line of fire along the trunk lid. The right front fender is deformed and has turned white. Source |
Figure onfire2. A fire rages, apparently on Vesey Street, sending up thick black smoke. These may be the vehicles that eyewitness Rebecca O. described as she ran past WTC6 during the destruction of WTC2. Source |
Figure 66(o). Why doesn't the paper burn?
Source: |
Figure 66(z). Why is this fire truck burnt? It is missing its front grill, headlights, and related fron end brightwork. Where are the tires?
Source: |
Figure 64. Peculiar wilting of car doors and deformed window surrounds on FDR Drive. Source: |
Figure 65. Map of lower Manhattan shows the WTC and FDR Drive a half mile or more apart. | |
Figure 66. Toasted cars in a lot near the WTC. Source: |
Figure 70. What was this thing across the street? Was it a car? Was it a van? What caused that line of burn marks on the hood of the car in the foreground on the right? In the left foreground, the remains of a vehicle sit atop a white sedan. Are we looking at the front or the back end? It looks like the front end and if it is, its engine is missing. We can see daylight through the wheelwell. Source: |
From album WTC Terrorist Attack Sep.11, 2001- Album #1 by member magicfan33 Top
Figure 20(a). Burned cars outside the WTC after both towers were destroyed. | Figure 20(b). |
Source |
Figure 21(a). Burning Wreck of WTC Towers Sep.11, 2001 Isnt it interesting that the traffic light is green (not red)? There is a weird irony with that. So, why wasnt the power knocked out? Do the traffic lights run on backup batteries? There is eyewitness testimony saying the power to WTC2 went off a second or two before WTC2 began to come apart. I believe this is true and that it was done to isolate the WTC Towers from the power grid. Otherwise, they may have knocked out the power grid over a very large (multi-state) area. We can remember when a power surge knocked out the power grid for NYC and much of the northeast. So, I cant imagine that a total destruction of a WTC tower in 10 seconds would not cause a problem. |
Figure 21(b). |
Source |
Figure 22(a). | Figure 22(b). |
Source |
Figure 23(a). | Figure 23(b). |
Source |
Figure 24(a). | Figure 24(b). |
Source |
Figure 25(a). | Figure 25(b). |
Source |
Figure 26(a). The building material is turning to dust as it falls! | Figure 26(b). |
Source |
Figure 27(a). These appear to be survivors moving to safety, so it is likely this picture was taken shortly after the two towers were "poofed" and before WTC7 dropped. What is the "fog" around their feet? If it were fine dust, it wouldnt have settled out of the air this quickly. If it were fine dust, it would have gradually settled out of the air, leaving the air clearer and clearer, gradually. Find dust would not move as a well-defined "cloud" and sink together. If it were kicked up by the feet, it would be more localized around the feet especially on the right. | Figure 27(b). |
Source |
Figure 28(a). That was not simple dust that hit this guys shirt. Whatever it was had direction and didnt hit the white part of his shirt. It looks like he was sprayed with brown paint while his tie was tucked in. But, why didn't it seep under the tie and wick across the fabric? It seems like it had to be a dry blast (unlike the familiar mud-puddle splash). | |
Source |
Top | homepage |
|
|
|
|
|