Jim Fetzer and John Hutchison



Dirt
WTC & Hutch (JJ)
WTC & Hutch (JJ)
Billiard Balls
Legal Challenges
no collapse
Introducing John Hutchison, on
Dynamic Duo radio show, February 28, 2008.
A transcript of the segment introducing first-time guest, John Hutchison
no collapse


Acknowledgements: The transcript work by "Archie" is greatly appreciated.
(mp3) audio of segment introducing John Hutchison, from 2/28/08
(mp3) audio of entire broadcast, introducing John Hutchison, from 2/28/08
(last updated April 6, 2007)
1. The Hutchison Effect - An Ace in the Hole?
1 March 2008, by Andrew Johnson

2. The Hutchison Effect - The Chips Have Fallen
11 March 2008, by Andrew Johnson

3. The Hutchison Effect - Handling the Truth
6 April 2008, by Andrew Johnson



no collapse no collapse

Dynamic Duo radio show, February 28, 2008
A transcript of the segment introducing first-time guest, John Hutchison

This was the first time Jim Fetzer had talked with John Hutchison and the first time John had been on "the Dynamic Duo" (with any host). This was an odd way to introduce a first-time guest to his show.

James Fetzer:
Now Judy, I’ve been informed that we have John Hutchison on the line. So John, I want to welcome you to The Dynamic Duo.
John Hutchison:
Hello.
James Fetzer:
John, could you tell us a little bit about yourself, you know, your background, your education, especially your training in science and technical subjects.
John Hutchison:
Well, my education is -- I flunked my coloring book and blocks. I’m self-taught, and I’ve been involved in many applications in engineering and research and one of them happened to be in to Nicola Tesla, which I was able to replicate a lot of his experiments. And pushing it beyond the envelope there, we managed to cause levitation of objects and also the destruction of objects, as it’s called. And it gained interest in to the U.S. military back in 1983, which they did a lot of experiments and tests with it.
James Fetzer:
So you grew up in Canada?

"How's the weather?" Doesn't Fetzer want to talk about the US military visiting his lab "back in 1983?" Their visit was four months long to learn what John was doing.

John Hutchison:
Yes, I did.
James Fetzer:
Where abouts?
John Hutchison:
I’m in New Westminster, British Columbia. I grew up in North Vancouver, by the way.
James Fetzer:
In North Vancouver.
John Hutchison:
Yes, I was away in Europe for a while…inaudible — (Jim Fetzer interrupts…)

Did Fetzer interrupt because he was afraid John was going to talk about his scientific research?

James Fetzer:
I presume you went to school there. High school for example?
John Hutchison:
Well, I had a private tutor and we were mostly in… I was in to chemistry quite a bit and I was in the chemical lab. Also gunsmithing and machine tool work. A little later on I got in to the Tesla stuff which is kind of intriguing.

Doesn't Fetzer want to talk about the Tesla stuff that is "kind of intriguing?"

James Fetzer:
Well, you never matriculated to a university. You didn’t actually… I don’t have a university degree. You don’t have an academic background or a scientific background other than what you learned in the process of your tutoring and your self learning.
John Hutchison:
That’s right. Yes, and thank God for that because if I had gone through the normal route, then I’d be programmed to not think outside of the box.
James Fetzer:
(Coughing) Excuse me. I’ve been under the weather all week with a nasty case of the stomach flu.How have you made your living, John?
John Hutchison:
Well, I have made my living through various, well, defense contractors, giving demonstrations for them as well as… that’s Canadian… as well as American, and from Germany, and of late, I’ve been doing a lot of television shows. There’s really high demand for that so …they pay large amounts of money for coming here to film.

Doesn' t Fetzer want to talk about the fact that various defense contractors have made extended visits to John's lab to film his work?

James Fetzer:
And before you got in to the effects and so…for your discoveries, how were you, you know, making ends meet?
John Hutchison:
Oh, way back past 1970?
James Fetzer:
Say… anytime. Fill me in.
John Hutchison:
Wow, that’s back in 1970… prior to that, I was involved in a major court case against the Canadian government on gun control issues. And prior to that, was just on welfare, getting odd jobs… that kind of thing.So… it was a lot of fun. That’s a long time ago. It seems like that.
James Fetzer:
You’re a kind of striking contrast cases because, of course, Judy has multiple degrees and academic background… around sixty peer-reviewed articles, and your background is completely the opposite.

Odd topic. Fetzer apparently doesn't agree with diversity in problem solving. The alternative to diversity is known as "inbreeding."

John Hutchison:
Yes, I’m kind of wild and wooley there, but it’s been an interesting adventure. (Dr. Wood’s voice heard briefly here…) I get along fine with the scientists and that. We work together on different projects and …
James Fetzer:
Go ahead, Judy.
Judy Wood:
Yes, I’ve noticed something different with John than the typical student. John thinks. The students… they check the answer in the back of the book and that’s... you know…what the answer is.


no collapse no collapse

ad hominem
ad hom'i·nem'
–adjective
American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Editionad hominem
[(ad hom-uh-nem, ad hom-uh-nuhm)]
A Latin expression meaning “to the man.” An ad hominem argument is one that relies on personal attacks rather than reason or substance.
ad hominem
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source
ad hom·i·nem   (ho&Mac249;m'?-nûm', -n?m)
download
adj.   Appealing to personal considerations rather than to logic or reason: Debaters should avoid ad hominem arguments that question their opponents' motives.


[Latin : ad, to + hominem, accusative of homÿ, man.]

ad hom'i·nem' adv.
Usage Note: As the principal meaning of the preposition ad suggests, the homo of ad hominem was originally the person to whom an argument was addressed, not its subject. The phrase denoted an argument designed to appeal to the listener's emotions rather than to reason, as in the sentence The Republicans' evocation of pity for the small farmer struggling to maintain his property is a purely ad hominem argument for reducing inheritance taxes. This usage appears to be waning; only 37 percent of the Usage Panel finds this sentence acceptable. The phrase now chiefly describes an argument based on the failings of an adversary rather than on the merits of the case: Ad hominem attacks on one's opponent are a tried-and-true strategy for people who have a case that is weak. Ninety percent of the Panel finds this sentence acceptable. The expression now also has a looser use in referring to any personal attack, whether or not it is part of an argument, as in It isn't in the best interests of the nation for the press to attack him in this personal, ad hominem way. This use is acceptable to 65 percent of the Panel. · Ad hominem has also recently acquired a use as a noun denoting personal attacks, as in "Notwithstanding all the ad hominem, Gingrich insists that he and Panetta can work together" (Washington Post). This usage may raise some eyebrows, though it appears to be gaining ground in journalistic style. · A modern coinage patterned on ad hominem is ad feminam, as in "Its treatment of Nabokov and its ad feminam attack on his wife Vera often border on character assassination" (Simon Karlinsky). Though some would argue that this neologism is unnecessary because the Latin word homo refers to humans generically, rather than to the male sex, in some contexts ad feminam has a more specific meaning than ad hominem, being used to describe attacks on women as women or because they are women, as in "Their recourse ... to ad feminam attacks evidences the chilly climate for women's leadership on campus" (Donna M. Riley).
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.

American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2006 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.




Top
28 February 2008
Interview: John Hutchison and Judy Wood are the guests of Jim Fetzer
on "The Dynamic Duo" Listen
edited: (mp3)
5-7 PM/EST (2-4 PM/PST) on GCN: www.gcnlive.com (ch. 4)
Does Jim Fetzer attempt to discredit John Hutchison? If so, then why? Jim Fetzer makes no scientific argument to the evidence.
Related Links

I wonder why Jim Fetzer did not interrogate Ace Baker about his scientific background, his lack of any degrees in science, and what his source of income has been for the last 40 years?

27 February 2008
Interview: Ace Baker is the guest of Jim Fetzer
on "The Dynamic Duo" Listen
edited: (mp3)
5-7 PM/EST on GCN:
http://www.gcnlive.com (ch. 4)
Do Ace Baker and Jim Fetzer attempt to discredit or "debunk" John Hutchison? They make no scientific argument about the evidence. Ace Baker admits that Ace Baker makes fake videos.
Related Links



no collapse no collapse


no collapse no collapse


(0:55) URL
Alyn Edwards describes John Hutchison's work on a BCTV - 1983 News Report (Introduction only)








Shortcut links


Dirt
WTC & Hutch (JJ)
Erin & Field (erin)
Billiard Balls
Qui Tam Case


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this webpage are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This webpage has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

© 2006-2008 Judy Wood and the author(s) above. All rights reserved.