| Bottom | homepage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/11 Weather Anomalies and Field Effects
Introduction
by
Judy Wood
This page last updated, May 19, 2008
This page is currently UNDER CONSTRUCTION.|
Click on images to navigate to pages.
|
(originally posted: March 25, 2008) Top
|
Introduction, In this pictorial study, information pertaining to the possible links between events on 9/11 and the occurrence in the Atlantic ocean of a Hurricane - Hurricane Erin - will be presented. Hurricane Erin was "born" on about the 1st of September 2001, and travelled up towards NYC. Hurricane Erin was the closest to NYC on 9/11/01 and was the largest on this date (although wind speeds were greater the day before). At the top of each page, the photo of Erin has an inset, where the plume of material from the destroyed WTC can be clearly seen. The crew of the International Space Station (ISS) can see "terrorist Carnage" in NYC on 9/11/01, they did not report seeing a hurricane that was just out of their camera shot (this video was shown on CNN). |
Hurricane Erin, September 11, 2001 |
|
 |
||
 |
 |
|
|
2, Comparison of Hurricane Data The development of the Erin is considered, and a comparison made to Hurricane Katrina, for the reason that Katrina and Erin were of comparable size (Erin was bigger, by most measures), yet we heard almost nothing of the risk Erin posed near 9/11 compared to what we heard about Katrina. Erin was also the subject of an extended study mission which ?united researchers from 10 universities, five NASA centers and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationä. |
||
|
3. Levitation, Material Effects and Storm Effects A short comparison is drawn between some of the effects seen with the materials in collision in Tornados and hurricanes with the anomalous changes in materials seen with Hutchison Effect. |
||
 |
 |
|
|
The development of "supercell" storms is examined and a comparison of their structure to that of a Tesla Coil is considered. It is therefore suggested that the electrical properties of large storm systems may have some similarities to Tesla coils and there is a possibility that technology exists to utilise or manipulate the energy in these storm systems for "secondary" purposes. |
 |
 |
|
One of the most striking elements of the data presented is that from a set of magnetometers monitored by the University of Alaska. Several instruments show significant deviations from "background" or "normal" readings as the events of 9/11 were unfolding. Further selections of this data is presented in relation to variations during the hurricane seasons of 2001, 2004 and 2005. |
 |
 |
|
An adjunct of the study is that of the development of and changes in the plume of material seen rising from the WTC complex following their destruction. Its “thinning” is noted, and a comparison made to other significant smoke plumes observed from space. The comparison indicates that the plume did not behave like particulate smoke from a chemical or wood fire. The relationship of the changes in the plume to dust particle sizes is briefly considered. |
 |
 |
|
A later part of the study examines some of the data relating to patterns of earthquakes and unusual weather patterns, which may be related to secret or partially disclosed environmental modification technology (such as HAARP), though no direct link to the events on 9/11 is established.
|
 |
 |
|
8. Beaming Power, Magnetic Reconnection, Rocks, Planet Earth The possible role of the compound Barium Titanate, is noted both in reference to the possible residue from persistent jet trails (usually called "chemtrails") and those used in some experiments by John Hutchison and Thomas Townsend Brown. Could there be some role for this compound in the manipulation of field effects? (It is noted here that the X-ray opacity of the Barium compound taken by patients before tests may also be significant in this area of study.) |
 |
 |
| Appendix1 | ||
| Appendix2 | ||
| Appendix3 | ||
 |
| Track of Hurricane Erin. (9/01-17/01) Source: |
|
Top
New Study by former Professor Examines Hurricane Erin on 9/11/01
by Andrew Johnson |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The new study, (posted at http://www.drjudywood.com/ Earlier, in January 2008, Dr. Wood posted a study on her website (http://drjudywood.com/ The new pictorial study (which also relates to Field Effects) notes that Hurricane Erin was "born" on about 1 September 2001, and travelled up towards NYC. Hurricane Erin was the closest to NYC on 9/11/01 and was the largest on this date (although wind speeds were greater the day before). Close-ups from photos of Erin on 9/11 clearly show the plume of material from the destroyed WTC. The development of Erin is considered, and a comparison made to Hurricane Katrina, for the reason that Katrina and Erin were of comparable size (Erin was bigger, by most measures). It is noted that the media reported very little about the potential risk Erin posed around the time of 9/11, compared to what was reported regarding Katrina – even before Katrina made landfall. The relationship between 9/11, the Hutchison Effect, Field Effects and data regarding Hurricane and Weather Modification is introduced. No firm conclusions are drawn, data is merely presented to illustrate where highly significant common themes and patterns seem to be present. For example, a short comparison is drawn between some of the effects seen with the materials in collision (caused by the effects of Tornados and hurricanes) with the anomalous changes in materials seen with Hutchison Effect. Apparent levitation effects seen in some instances are also highlighted. The development of “super cell” storms is examined and a comparison of their structure to that of a Tesla Coil (used to create high voltage electrical discharges) is considered. The possibility is suggested that the electrical properties of large storm systems may have some similarities to those of Tesla coils and that there is a possibility that technology exists to utilise or manipulate the energy in these storm systems for “secondary” One of the most striking pieces of the data presented is that from a set of magnetometers monitored by the University of Alaska. Several instruments show significant deviations from “background” A later part of the study examines some of the data relating to patterns of earthquakes in 2008 and possibly associated unusual weather patterns, which may be related to secret or partially disclosed environmental modification technology (such as HAARP). However, the study does not establish any clear links between HAARP and the events in New York on 9/11. Dr. Wood will be discussing the study and at two upcoming presentations on May 29 in Seattle and June 1 in Portland, Oregon. Details below.
# # # |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Source: http://www.prlog.org/10073301-new-study-by-former-professor-examines-hurricane-erin-on-9-11-01.html | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Top
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Top
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Top
|
|
Comment, by stevenwarran
|
| "We stand at the beginning of a new age. Our government has in its hands a method of disrupting the molecular basis for matter, and its first impulse was to weaponize it. Is this so hard to understand? Like splitting atoms to create destruction was so hard to understand in 1945? Of course this new "invention" came when the United States ruled supreme. A weapon system of vast new power comes on line and we didn't have an enemy worthy of it, so naturally, we use it on ourselves, wag the dog.”
by stevenwarran, source
|