|
|
|
Dr. Judy Wood on behalf of the United States of America,
Plaintiff/Relator,
vs.
Applied Research Associates, Inc., et al.,Defendants.
DC Docket Number: (07-cv-3314)
Docket Number: (08-3799-cv)
Supreme Court Docket Number: (09-548)
|
Qui-Tam,
Documents filed: October 14, 2009,
Wood v. Applied Research Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Response due December 4, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qui-Tam,
Documents filed: June 9, 2009, Wood v. Applied Research Associates, Inc.
|
Docket as of June 24, 2009 2:09 am Page 18
|
|
|
|
6/19/09
|
|
Appellant Judy Wood, affidavit in response to Appellee's motion for leave to file a sur-reply, filed with proof of service. [Entry date Jun 19 2009 ] [EM] |
|
6/22/09
|
|
Notice to counsel: Request to present exhibits at oral argument is DENIED. (via phone) [Entry date Jun 22 2009] [DC] |
|
6/23/09
|
|
Case heard before panel: MINER, LIVINGSTON, C.JJ. TRAGER, D.J. [Entry date Jun 23 2009] [AG] |
|
|
|
Qui-Tam, NOTICE OF HEARING DATE, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Hearing Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 10:00 a.m.
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Court House
40 Poley Square, New York, N.Y. 1007
Notice Dated: May 8, 2009, Wood v. Applied Research Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Qui-Tam, Appellant Reply, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
January 29, 2009, Jerry V. Leaphart, Danbury, CT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qui-Tam, Appellees' Request for Extension of Time
Counsel for Applied Research Associates, Inc.
October 29, 2008, Applied Research Associates
|
Qui-Tam, Ammended Scheduling Order,
United States Court of Appeals. Docket No. 08-3799-cv
October 30, 2008, Vidya Kurella, Staff Counsel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Judy Wood on behalf of the United States of America,
Plaintiff/Relator,
vs.
Applied Research Associates, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
|
|
|
Qui-Tam, Appellant Brief
October 23, 2008, Jerry V. Leaphart, Danbury, CT
|
|
|
Qui-Tam, Appellant Affidavit
October 23, 2008, Judy Wood, Clemson, SC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Judy Wood on behalf of the United States of America,
Plaintiff/Relator,
vs.
Applied Research Associates, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
|
|
|
Dr. Morgan Reynolds on behalf of the United States of America,
Plaintiff/Relator,
vs.
Science Applications International Corp., et al.,
Defendants.
|
|
|
|
Qui-Tam, Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
July 23, 2008, Jerry V. Leaphart, Danbury, CT
|
|
|
Qui-Tam, Deny Motion to Reconsider Decision
July 11, 2008, George B. Daniels, United States District Judge, New York, NY
|
|
|
Qui-Tam, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3
July 11, 2008, Jerry V. Leaphart, Danbury, CT
|
|
|
Qui-Tam, MemorandumDecision of Wood
June 26, 2008, George B. Daniels, United States District Judge, New York, NY
|
|
|
|
Qui-Tam, Deny Motion to Reconsider Decision
July 11, 2008, George B. Daniels, United States District Judge, New York, NY
|
|
|
Qui-Tam, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3
July 11, 2008, Jerry V. Leaphart, Danbury, CT
|
|
|
Qui-Tam, Memorandum Decision of Reynolds
June 26, 2008, George B. Daniels, United States District Judge, New York, NY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments?
I would like to know your thoughts on the above decision. You may leave a brief anonymous message, a contact source and/or a time/method to contact you. 500 character limit. You may also specify a particular recipient.
|
|
